If anything, the following amounts to no more than a rant. No, not a rant...there's no anger in this, just...I don't know. I'm not good at putting my thoughts into words (enter irony). Anyways, I'm guessing my muse for this...writing is the current state of events according to facebook. I hate to admit, as of late I've become quite apathetic to current events, especially those of a political nature. Seeing as I was quite attuned to said events in the past, it's been a marked change in me...embodying what I once professed never to be, a "sheep" if you will. But I digress.
Pretty much, facebook is now my "news" source, since I don't watch the news on television, or read the paper, or even partake in perusing their cybernetic counterparts. I blame this on laziness: being informed takes work. That being said, this "note" isn't backed by research, or even fact. This note is endorsed by pure opinion. Not the opinion of an expert, but by me, so take that as you will.
It seems that equality is at the forefront of many people's statuses as of late. Paula Deen and the D.O.M.A. thing come to mind. In fact, they're precisely my inspiration for this. I omit the Martin case because I know nothing about it other than it's very racially charged.
I'll start with the D.O.M.A. case. It's a small step in the right direction. I'll never understand why some people are against gay marriage. It's not my cup of tea, but I can't allow my preferences to preclude others from the pursuit of happiness. Sound vaguely familiar? It should. This, again, is solely my opinion, but if two (or more, but we'll leave that debate for another time) consenting adults aren't harming anyone, who am I to stop them? What makes me better than them? What makes me think I know what's best for them more than they do?
Perhaps I'm biased. I'm not religious, so there's no dogma reverberating in the back of my mind. I won't get into religion, since I respect everyone's decision to believe as they see fit, and I'm not about to proselytize. All I'm saying is, I wish that church and state would truly be segregated. The pilgrims voyaged to North America in the hopes of escaping religious oppression at the hands of their government. The founding fathers envisioned a nation with freedom of religion. To me, it's hypocritical to deny a segment of the populace certain rights based on the religious beliefs of some. Albeit, these religious beliefs are shared by the majority of our nation, but all one has to do is abstain from acquiring a gay marriage.
The sanctity of marriage is always brought up. If your marriage is really threatened by the marriage of others-strangers-then maybe your marriage is the one that isn't sanctioned. It's on shaky foundation at best, a load of bull at worst. It's hard to face facts sometimes, but it must be done in order to grow.
My acceptance of others' right to be gay and get married is one of pure logic. I'm not one swayed by peer pressure. Just because others get a gay marriage doesn't mean I want one. Heck, I don't even want a straight marriage! But, if people want to restrict themselves, then by all means go for it.I'm coming from a libertarian point-of-view. I simply believe that if someone, an adult with their mental faculties intact, wants to do something, and no third parties will be harmed, let them! I will refrain from discussing my more...taboo opinions on other topics, since I don't want to get too derailed from the original premise for this writing, but those of you brave and open-minded enough are free to pick my brain anytime through messaging or even in person.
Before I forget, I'll quickly discuss the Paula Deen debacle. From what I understand-correct me if I'm wrong-she said a certain word that's extremely offensive. To me, words are powerless. I see no difference between saying the "f" word and "chair," for example. Actions are the true hallmark of a person's character. I'm the kind of person that observes others, I don't really listen. Anyone can say anything, but if they follow through, that's rare. That's what matters to me. Call me a skeptic.
So Deen said something. It was a long time ago. She could've denied it like so many of us do. Many people have said that particular word before, in various contexts and timeframes. She was brave enough to admit her folly(ies). It's hard to face facts sometimes, but it must be done in order to grow.
Doubtlessly, she'll be given redemption on some other television network. Martha Stewart was, and she (to my knowledge) never showed remorse for her actions. Deen has apologized profusely for her words. Think about that.
I'll get off my soapbox, but not before reiterating that my waxing philosophic is purely my opinion. I've done no extensive research. I arrive at my opinions through logic, not emotions, so yes, they're a bit cold. So, if y'all could completely rip me to shreds or laud my efforts-entertain me if you will-I'd appreciate it.