[While the current title and subtitle of this whimsical composition is, I suppose, sufficiently sufficient (an intentional tautology, appended if for no better reason but for the sheer orgiastic oratorical onanism, therewithal) and satisfies me more than if this farcical blog entry was to be left totally bereft of any functioning title whatsoever, I still am somewhat dissatisfied with the whole business of entitling blogs on Bluelight.
What can I say? There's no justifying my eccentricity: captious caviling and capricious caterwauling, all over linguistic punctilio and all out if an inborn monomanical obsession with communicative proficiency and perfection percolating down to the finest of details. And not to mention -- OK, I'll stop with the tangents and mouthy meandering for now.
Anyway, back to the topic of the title. As I've never been one to count that which is pithy and pointed as having precedence and priority over that which is piquant and poignant, one would see clearly why I would take such umbrage with the inclusion of a mandatory and unavoidable character limitation for blog titles.
One of the paramount reasons for why I frequent online message boards and avoid Twitter, YouTube, and other awful Internet offal is because message boards typically allow for unfettered, unlimited, and relatively unrestricted communicative expressivity—which I happen to greatly enjoy.
But, once again, my attempts at verbal freshness, impressive expression and expressive impression, authorial creativity, and vocable virtuosity, and generally dexterous word slinging have proved arrantly abortive, as the entelechy of my elocution is thwarted by a unnecessarily stupid, incredibly inane, stupefyingly stultifying, rebarbative and superfluous character limit.
As I had previously styled this title—with all tantalizing, titular turgidity (in a good way) and phrasal fecundity—having had initially decided upon a more apropos and demonstrative title with which to denominate and style this apocryphal anecdote. But, not to sound repetitive, as per usually, my attempts at creative composition were unavailing.
At any rate, this text was not cooked up with the intention to carom dulcet syllables and mellifluous lexemes against a bovine audience's eardrums. Like it, dislike it; love it, loathe it; take it or leave it—you have your druthers and as well as the freedom to avert your eyes at what they find unsightly.
As with all my written material, the person to whom I should strive to please is myself. It is my opinion that a writer ceases to be any longer a writer when they write not for their own amusement or satisfaction, but to obsequiously oblige another. At that lowly, pitiable point the writer goes from being a creator of text to being indistinguishable from that of the work-for-hire amanuensis; the scribe has transmogrified into the secretary, as a kind of reversed metamorphosis—the graceful and beauteous butterfly has regressed to the slithering, hard-featured, uglily undulating, corpulent and distended wormlike caterpillar. A critter no more appreciable than its legless lookalikes: the vile worm and the repugnant slug.]
Well, there was that one time—not too far back—when I had fallen asleep on the couch at a friend of a friend's house. Took a few handfuls too many downers, drank a few too many shots of Bourbon, and to make a long and discomfitting story short and easier to confess, I blacked out on the davenport whilst watching reruns of Frasier.
Woke up some hours later, and, well--erh--I just knew that, whatever had happened, it wasn't right. But I've been having weekly, one-to-one therapy sessions ever since. A tête-à-tête with a phlegmatic, affectedly sympathetic therapist; dispassionately ensconced in a leather executive armchair positioned behind a megalithic mahogany wooden desk (which probably costed more than my car).
Yep, a professional sinecure of a psychiatrist, to whom I'm paying a higher rate for a one hour session than I would for a licentious liaison with a high-class harlot. At least the harlot sucks my cock and lets me fuck her before she takes my whole week's wages for a hour's tryst. At any rate, the shrink has a lot in common with the strumpet: they both get paid exorbitant rates for an uncomfortably awkward and fleeting moment of their time; they both are overpaid and underworked while I am over paying to be overworked; they both have an uncanny ability to make my money feel squandered, my time seem frittered, and my worth seem nothing but negligible and my existence entirely expendable. But I'm getting too discursive, here.
Anyway, I feel I'm making real strides now, honestly; the doc thinks I'm fast approaching a full recovery and all this will soon be behind me (if only the trauma didn't cause me to have such a terrible fear of things being behind me, surely I'd find progress coming more quickly and more often, but I digress).
Ah, right -- I almost forgot! There's one last thing to add: I presume the obvious fact I'm being droll and waggish needs to be explicitly stated, out of consideration for those of amid the audience of whom suffer from profound intellectual deficiencies and tone-deafness (with regarding to overtones and undertones—that's called a pun), and also any cretins positioned to the far left side of a Guassian distribution for intelligence quotient (or being at least 3 standard deviations below the mean, median, or mode IQ of the sample). And so there you uncouth oafs have it. Your very own supererogatory-and-unnessarily-protracted-for-anybody-not-affected-by-a-pathological-case-of-feather-brained-feeble-minded-fuck-headedness caveat, you clodhoppers.
But one thing is still puzzling me: why do the figurative and literal senses of 'butthurt' differ so markedly their meanings? When one is figuratively butthurt, the connotation is that they're miffed, indignant, offended, or chagrined. Whereaif one is said to be literally butthurt—as in having a painful sensation emanating from their and they're emotionally nothing of the sort.
What sensible person would actually find anger, offense, indignation, annoyance, or petulance to be appropriate and suitable emotive reactions to being afflicted with a severe case of hemorrhoids, being sodomized by an uuncomfortably well-endowed rapist, having a chronic anal fissure which repeatedly rips and bleeds profusely each time you take a shit or wipe your ass, etc.?
To me, it would seem more natural to become despondent, forlorn, emotionally labile, lachrymose—lying curled up into a fetal position overwrought with dreary self-abasement, in a mire of dejection, lugubrious and ashamed while you unavailing try to drown your sorrows facedown in a puddle of your own tears.