• Philosophy and Spirituality
    Welcome Guest
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
    Threads of Note Socialize
  • P&S Moderators: JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Christians and Aliens

Journyman16 said:
You AGW types are such NICE people aren't you? What is it about your beliefs that makes you all so nasty - conversation is an art form whereas abuse is just lowlife responses.

We will see - there's been no warming for better than 15 years now and Solar Cycle 25 looks like it ain't gonna be a happening thang, which puts us right on track for another Little Ice Age. NOAA, NCDC and NASA have all been caught out altering their data to make the case for warming.
Click to expand...

well first off i did say sir... so not all that rude lol and second the graph you posted says temperature variations mine, is a chart of the hottest years since 1880... and trying to say that it is a hoax being pulled off by thousands of scientists and people who are going through the worst droughts and forest fires in generations sounds completely fucking insane and its people like you who are going to end life on this planet... and with how big of an organization NASA is how do you expect that they would be able to pull off a massive hoax like global warming, and why would a group of the smartest people on the planet want to??? to put oil companies out of bussiness?? think about it for 2 seconds, who is more likely to lie, a goverment org or the largest companies on the planet who time and time again have fucked over the enviorment, lied about it and just done it again??? jesus i always thought you aussies were suspose to be smart, but mabe i was thinking of ppl from NZ, yall do kinda sound and look the same... but i guess every country has their "backwards thinkers"....

PS... I also changed my mind and hope a dingo just mauls your dick off and leaves you unable to have a baby....
 
Last edited:
actually you need to check and learn to read a fucking graph cause that shit you posted only confirms my earlier post... look at it the only time the line dips below 0.0 (this century) is 2008... not one of the top ten warmest years in on record.... but what can you really expect from a country founded by rapist and criminals... besides being dumb as shit and making my point for me that is?? but to your credit mabe being on the bottom of the world makes the graph look upside down, kinda like how water rotates in the opposite direction when you flush the shitter.... lol for real tho i cant help but to be a little mean when ppl like you make claims that are sooooooo retarded and impact the rest of us who are use to science and facts and other crazy things like that
 
pill_billy said:
but what can you really expect from a country founded by rapist and criminals... besides being dumb as shit and making my point for me that is?? but to your credit mabe being on the bottom of the world makes the graph look upside down
Click to expand...

See, this is what this board is like.

This is the place where people regularly show up to boast they've discovered evolutionary science and found it in themselves to question Christianity so they're, obviously, one cut above the rest.
 
Ninae said:
See, this is what this board is like.

This is the place where people regularly show up to boast they've discovered evolutionary science and found it in themselves to question Christianity so they're, obviously, one cut above the rest.
Click to expand...

im confussed..... dont really get what your saying.....
 
It was just an example of how simple some are. They think they're pointing out something new and doesn't seem to realise everyone has gone through that phase and more than half of the Western world think like that.

Plus, religion versus science is a false choice, and people are fighting for nothing. They don't represent two opposing sides and there's no side to fight for. Just different sides of life you can focus on.
 
Journyman, you're getting crazier and crazier.

How is this stuff about the global warming conspiracy not a belief?
 
I believe Jesus was an alien. Much of the bible depicts visions and events which correlate with modern UFO sightings. Ezekiel and the visions of wheels in the sky and much of the book of revelation seems IMO to depict craft and creatures of extra terrestrial origin. Also genesis (IIRC) talks about the fallen nephilim who mated with earthly females. Sorry if I've gone off topic a little! I'm just firmly of the opinion that earth has been influenced, monitored, studied and manipulated by extraterrestrials for eons. I also believe, as does Iran, that the upper echelons of the US government is influenced by a race of aliens known as The Tall Whites...
 
pill_billy said:
actually you need to check and learn to read a fucking graph cause that shit you posted only confirms my earlier post... look at it the only time the line dips below 0.0 (this century) is 2008... not one of the top ten warmest years in on record.... but what can you really expect from a country founded by rapist and criminals... besides being dumb as shit and making my point for me that is?? but to your credit mabe being on the bottom of the world makes the graph look upside down, kinda like how water rotates in the opposite direction when you flush the shitter.... lol for real tho i cant help but to be a little mean when ppl like you make claims that are sooooooo retarded and impact the rest of us who are use to science and facts and other crazy things like that
Click to expand...

It really does actually, and I agree with you, not at all one of the top ten warmest years on record at all.
I mean, you can´t rely on graphs like that. We can´t be that naive. There are so many other directions, diversity exist to a great extent and, of course, there are different ways, a lot, to interpreter data etc, etc. On the subject, that was minimalist, to say the least.
 
pill_billy said:
well first off i did say sir... so not all that rude lol and second the graph you posted says temperature variations mine, is a chart of the hottest years since 1880... and trying to say that it is a hoax being pulled off by thousands of scientists and people who are going through the worst droughts and forest fires in generations sounds completely fucking insane and its people like you who are going to end life on this planet... and with how big of an organization NASA is how do you expect that they would be able to pull off a massive hoax like global warming, and why would a group of the smartest people on the planet want to??? to put oil companies out of bussiness?? think about it for 2 seconds, who is more likely to lie, a goverment org or the largest companies on the planet who time and time again have fucked over the enviorment, lied about it and just done it again??? jesus i always thought you aussies were suspose to be smart, but mabe i was thinking of ppl from NZ, yall do kinda sound and look the same... but i guess every country has their "backwards thinkers"....

PS... I also changed my mind and hope a dingo just mauls your dick off and leaves you unable to have a baby....
Click to expand...
And once more you show who you really are. Believe it or not, putting in one word followed by vitriol such as yours does not change the level of vitriol. Sir.

As for the graph, you should read before you post - it is not saying anything except what it says - that 2014 is not the hottest as claimed - 2010 was hotter and so was 1998. It's not difficult, just try not engaging rage before reading.

You should read more about climate and history as well. Droughts were worse back around 1900. In the US as well as Australia. The US had their dust bowl years in the 30's, when thousands left the plains because things got so bad.

Forest fires are only 'worse' because we now live in many places where we didn't, and we have maniacs going around lighting them for kicks. Just like hurricanes and cyclones are not actually worse but affect more people because there are now hundreds of millions where there used to be tens of millions.

It doesn't take thousands of people to run the hoax, as you'd know if you read more. The sources of data are where they are generated with 'corrections' and 'adjustments' made by people who have been caught red-handed doing it in their own writing.

Go download Climategate 1 and 2 and see for yourself.

Oh... and none of the sceptics about AGW has actually been shown to be in receipt of corporate money but we DO know that the USA alone has spent $79 billion in the past decade on AGW. So you might want to be cautious before throwing the money claim around. Those same AGW priests who have been caught with Climategate ALSO talked about how to transfer their grants over into private accounts so as to avoid taxes. Apparently if they do it in less than $10,000 per day they don't get slugged.
 
Perhaps a Mod could either rename this thread to 'Rants by AGW True Believers' or maybe just close it - seems nobody wants to actually address the topic.
 
I don't cherish my encounters with lunatics on public transport who engage me in conversation about governmental conspiracy theories.
That doesn't mean I want to exist in a word of clones...

Perhaps you could take your own advice and impersonate a professor in therapy?

seems nobody wants to actually address the topic
Click to expand...

That's strange.

Conversation is an art, remember?
And, I thought you were an artist...?

...

You can delete your own threads.
 
As for the graph, you should read before you post - it is not saying anything except what it says - that 2014 is not the hottest as claimed - 2010 was hotter and so was 1998. It's not difficult, just try not engaging rage before reading.
Click to expand...

You have absolutely no understanding of basic science.
You are reading the graph wrong.

Isn't this embarrassing, yet?
 
ForEverAfter said:
You have absolutely no understanding of basic science.
You are reading the graph wrong.

Isn't this embarrassing, yet?
Click to expand...
I'd have thought embarrassing would be the constant posting, over and over, of off-topic troll posts. Conversation may be an art but it hangs in a gallery you clearly don't visit.

and yet, like the other true believers, you provide no alternatives. Perhaps you should enlighten us as to how one might otherwise read 'Global average Temperature Variations' other than to say, the satellites definitely say 2014 was NOT the hottest year on record? (which is claimed in the MSM and a couple of posts before mine)
 
I'd have thought embarrassing would be the constant posting, over and over, of off-topic troll posts.
Click to expand...

This thread has failed because of your attitude. I attempted, initially, to engage you...

Conversation may be an art but it hangs in a gallery you clearly don't visit.
Click to expand...

But you do visit the gallery, right? Because you're a professor and a master of conversation?

I wasn't the one who claimed that conversation was an art and that I was an artist.
I'm also not hitting numerous dead-ends in different threads and being exposed as ignorant.
(Probably because I don't presume to understand every field of science, when I clearly don't.)

According to your graph, 9/10 of the hottest years on record (since 1979) were post 1997...
You posted the image after saying that there has been no warming for 15 years...
The graph completely misrepresents your overall point...

So, you either don't know how to read graphs or you're attempting to flip-flop and contradict your own viewpoint?
Either way, it's sloppy and embarrassing (considering the level of intellectual arrogance you exude).
 
Last edited:
I may have claimed conversation was an art but I made no claims about me - you're just making stuff up. Go read the thread.

According to the graph, 2014 was NOT the hottest year on record and that proves everything I was saying IN RESPONSE TO a claim made a post or two before. If you want to dispute a longer time frame then we can bring in the 1930's where 2 or 3 years were higher than 1998 until the data was altered by the priests of AGW. Go read the other threads.

As for your ridiculous claim to attempt to engage me you did no such thing - from your first post you tried to lecture me about how wrong I was on a subject I never actually addressed. You are adversarial where you do not have to be and antagonistic where there is no need. Conventionalist to the core.

And the thread failed because of people like you who like to go around and attack anyone who has a different view. There's words for people like that - none of them are nice ones.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top