Hey, I'm genuinely seeking clarification on this, rather than trying to argue the toss. And I hope it goes without saying that it's about the policy, and not a personal issue with you.
So with my posts that got removed, if I'd added or began with some kind of clearly defined caveat along the lines of, 'I'm not generalising about the entire Muslim population of these areas, as I would imagine the problems I refer to are based on the actions of a minority of that population, which are unfortunately creating a bad impression on the areas as a whole' and then carried on to say '......but, the areas which are most densely populated by these populations have been documented to seemingly have the worst problems in the area for fly tipping', would my posts have been allowed to stand?
It was poor and slack of me to use the embarrassingly clichéd old "I'm not being racist, but......", without further clarification, and maybe I was subconsciously testing these newish waters. We've all got to be up to speed with these now, as to how exactly things need to be stated, not only to avoid online censorship, but also to avoid causing offense, or coming across as ignorant, bigoted, or just not keeping up with things, in everyday conversation.