Whaaaaat?
167 statements were altered retrospectively. it absolutely CAN be investigated further. The reasons for those alterations NEED to be established and people can be culpable, as can those directing the tone and direction of the investigation which led those officers to alter the statements.
there's VERY clear evidence which absolutely could lead to individual culpability.
It's nonsense that this can't be investigated with direct results and outcomes being achieved. It's very good example of something that can be
167 statements were altered retrospectively. it absolutely CAN be investigated further. The reasons for those alterations NEED to be established and people can be culpable, as can those directing the tone and direction of the investigation which led those officers to alter the statements.
there's VERY clear evidence which absolutely could lead to individual culpability.
It's nonsense that this can't be investigated with direct results and outcomes being achieved. It's very good example of something that can be