• LAVA Moderator: Shinji Ikari

Are men smarter than women? (merged)

Men on average, versus women on average, are:

Seven percent taller.
Twice as strong.
Fifty percent heavier.
Endowed with 3 1/2 billion more brain cells (22.8 billion vs. 19.3 billion).
Forty seven points (18.5%) higher scoring in SAT Math Exams.
Seven percent higher scoring in SAT Verbal Exams.
One hundred points (42%) higher scoring in Graduate Record Exams.

Twenty two points higher scoring in Numbers & Equations. Exams.

Forty two points higher scoring in Calculus Exams.

Thirty one points higher scoring in Geometry Exams.

Thirty four points higher scoring in Physics Exams.

Fifty three points higher scoring in Mechanics Exams.

Twenty one points higher scoring in Electricity & Magnetism Exams.

Six points higher scoring in Heat Exams.

Eighteen points higher scoring Wave Phenomena Exams.

Twenty points higher scoring in Modern Physics Exams.

Thirty one points higher scoring in Advanced Math Exams.

Twenty three points higher scoring in General Science Exams.

Eleven points higher scoring in General Math Exams.
Forty percent higher scoring in hand/eye coordination contests like Olympic Platform Diving.
Twelve percent faster in track.
More emotionally stable.
Forty two precent greater income earners overall.
Sixty seven percent greater income earners in sales positions.
Responsible for 90% of average family incomes (California Senate Task Force on Family Equity).
More than one hundred percent of IRS Personal Income Tax Payees.
Less than 10% of federal social/welfare beneficiaries.
Ninety four percent of the prison population.
Perpetrators of less than half of serious crimes.
94% of child support collection efforts.
Pay more and
Are twice as likely to pay the "child support" ordered.
Acquitted one ninth as often for the same crime.
Sentenced 3 times as long for the same crime.
Less than 1% of harassment and discrimination lawsuits against their employers.
Recipients of less than 10% of “family leave benefits”.
Expected to live seven years shorter.
One third of Social Security recipients.
Eighty percent of murder victims, with no “Violence Against Men Act” to protect them.
Sixty percent of violent crime victims.
Five times more likely to commit suicide.
Sole initiators of 27% of domestic violence.
Perpetrators of 46% of “severe” domestic violence.
One fourth as likely to file for divorce.
Custodial parents of less than 4% of children of divorce.
One eighth as likely to kill their children.
One eighth as likely to abuse their children.
Holders of less than 35% of the nation’s wealth (Fortune Magazine).
Systemically discriminated against by law through affirmative action.
Forty seven percent of the nation's voters.
Ninety seven percent of “Noted American Cartoonists”.
Ninety seven percent of “Noted Business Leaders, Industrialists, & Philanthropists”.
Seventy eight percent of “Noted Personalities”.
Eighty six percent of winners of “The Springdarn Medal” by the NAACP.
Ninety nine percent of “National Inventors’ Hall of Fame”.
Eighty five percent of Computer Science Doctorates.
Ninety nine point nine percent of America’s 524,732 battle deaths.
One hundred percent of “National Aviation Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “National Baseball Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “College Football Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “Pro Football Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “National Basketball Association Champions”.
One hundred percent of “National Hockey League Yearly Trophy Winners”.
One hundred percent of “American Bowling Congress Champions”.
One hundred percent of “World Boxing Title Holders”.
One hundred percent of “World Wrestling Championships”.
One hundred percent of “Kentucky Derby Winners”.
One hundred percent of “Tour de France Winners”.
One hundred percent of “Harness Racing Records”.
One hundred percent of “Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association Winners”.
One hundred percent of “US Open Championships” in golf.
One hundred percent of “Indianapolis 500” auto racing winners.
One hundred percent of “World Gran Prix Driver Champions”.
One hundred percent of “America’s Cup Record” in yachting.
One hundred percent of “World Champions in Chess”.
One hundred percent of “US Champions in Chess”.
One hundred (oops, 98.8) percent of Fortune 500 Corporations’ CEOs.
One hundred percent of US presidents.
One hundred percent of the authors of constitutions.
One hundred percent of the original disciples of world religions.
One hundred percent of “Poets Laureate of England”.
One hundred percent of “Enrico Fermi Award Winners”.
One hundred (oops, ninety five percent) of “Templeton Foundation Prize for Progress in Religion”.
Ninety percent of “Bollingen Prize in Poetry Winners”.
Ninety nine point seven percent of “Nobel Prize in Physics” winners.
Ninety nine percent of “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” winners.
Ninety six percent of “Nobel Prize for Medicine” winners*.
One hundred percent of “Nobel Prize for Economic Science” winners.
Ninety eight (oops, ninety three, oops ninety) percent of “Nobel Prize in Literature” winners.
Ninety five percent of “Nobel Peace Prize” winners.
One hundred percent of “Pulitzer Prize for News Photography” winners.
Ninety six percent of “Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting” winnners.
One hundred percent of Navy SEALS.
 
I read today that Australian scientists have discovered that the part of the brain which controls language and communication is 20% bigger in women than in men.

Aha! Scientific proof of why we always win arguments ;)
 
galahan said:
Men on average, versus women on average, are:

Seven percent taller.
Twice as strong.
Fifty percent heavier.
Endowed with 3 1/2 billion more brain cells (22.8 billion vs. 19.3 billion).
Forty seven points (18.5%) higher scoring in SAT Math Exams.
Seven percent higher scoring in SAT Verbal Exams.
One hundred points (42%) higher scoring in Graduate Record Exams.

Twenty two points higher scoring in Numbers & Equations. Exams.

Forty two points higher scoring in Calculus Exams.

Thirty one points higher scoring in Geometry Exams.

Thirty four points higher scoring in Physics Exams.

Fifty three points higher scoring in Mechanics Exams.

Twenty one points higher scoring in Electricity & Magnetism Exams.

Six points higher scoring in Heat Exams.

Eighteen points higher scoring Wave Phenomena Exams.

Twenty points higher scoring in Modern Physics Exams.

Thirty one points higher scoring in Advanced Math Exams.

Twenty three points higher scoring in General Science Exams.

Eleven points higher scoring in General Math Exams.
Forty percent higher scoring in hand/eye coordination contests like Olympic Platform Diving.
Twelve percent faster in track.
More emotionally stable.
Forty two precent greater income earners overall.
Sixty seven percent greater income earners in sales positions.
Responsible for 90% of average family incomes (California Senate Task Force on Family Equity).
More than one hundred percent of IRS Personal Income Tax Payees.
Less than 10% of federal social/welfare beneficiaries.
Ninety four percent of the prison population.
Perpetrators of less than half of serious crimes.
94% of child support collection efforts.
Pay more and
Are twice as likely to pay the "child support" ordered.
Acquitted one ninth as often for the same crime.
Sentenced 3 times as long for the same crime.
Less than 1% of harassment and discrimination lawsuits against their employers.
Recipients of less than 10% of “family leave benefits”.
Expected to live seven years shorter.
One third of Social Security recipients.
Eighty percent of murder victims, with no “Violence Against Men Act” to protect them.
Sixty percent of violent crime victims.
Five times more likely to commit suicide.
Sole initiators of 27% of domestic violence.
Perpetrators of 46% of “severe” domestic violence.
One fourth as likely to file for divorce.
Custodial parents of less than 4% of children of divorce.
One eighth as likely to kill their children.
One eighth as likely to abuse their children.
Holders of less than 35% of the nation’s wealth (Fortune Magazine).
Systemically discriminated against by law through affirmative action.
Forty seven percent of the nation's voters.
Ninety seven percent of “Noted American Cartoonists”.
Ninety seven percent of “Noted Business Leaders, Industrialists, & Philanthropists”.
Seventy eight percent of “Noted Personalities”.
Eighty six percent of winners of “The Springdarn Medal” by the NAACP.
Ninety nine percent of “National Inventors’ Hall of Fame”.
Eighty five percent of Computer Science Doctorates.
Ninety nine point nine percent of America’s 524,732 battle deaths.
One hundred percent of “National Aviation Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “National Baseball Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “College Football Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “Pro Football Hall of Fame”.
One hundred percent of “National Basketball Association Champions”.
One hundred percent of “National Hockey League Yearly Trophy Winners”.
One hundred percent of “American Bowling Congress Champions”.
One hundred percent of “World Boxing Title Holders”.
One hundred percent of “World Wrestling Championships”.
One hundred percent of “Kentucky Derby Winners”.
One hundred percent of “Tour de France Winners”.
One hundred percent of “Harness Racing Records”.
One hundred percent of “Professional Rodeo Cowboy Association Winners”.
One hundred percent of “US Open Championships” in golf.
One hundred percent of “Indianapolis 500” auto racing winners.
One hundred percent of “World Gran Prix Driver Champions”.
One hundred percent of “America’s Cup Record” in yachting.
One hundred percent of “World Champions in Chess”.
One hundred percent of “US Champions in Chess”.
One hundred (oops, 98.8) percent of Fortune 500 Corporations’ CEOs.
One hundred percent of US presidents.
One hundred percent of the authors of constitutions.
One hundred percent of the original disciples of world religions.
One hundred percent of “Poets Laureate of England”.
One hundred percent of “Enrico Fermi Award Winners”.
One hundred (oops, ninety five percent) of “Templeton Foundation Prize for Progress in Religion”.
Ninety percent of “Bollingen Prize in Poetry Winners”.
Ninety nine point seven percent of “Nobel Prize in Physics” winners.
Ninety nine percent of “Nobel Prize in Chemistry” winners.
Ninety six percent of “Nobel Prize for Medicine” winners*.
One hundred percent of “Nobel Prize for Economic Science” winners.
Ninety eight (oops, ninety three, oops ninety) percent of “Nobel Prize in Literature” winners.
Ninety five percent of “Nobel Peace Prize” winners.
One hundred percent of “Pulitzer Prize for News Photography” winners.
Ninety six percent of “Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting” winnners.
One hundred percent of Navy SEALS.

Oh phleeaze. So you're better at maths and science and physically stronger. What a revelation! Quick, someone call the newspapers!

There is so much more to the human capacity than riding bulls and creating equations. Emotional intelligence, networking, communication...... Women and men are smart in different ways, it's that simple.
 
Men have testosterone which gives them superhuman strength and reasoning abilities (especially when drunk) Womens Estrogen gives them mood swings, and lapses of judgement.

ROTFL.

SLM my point was that authors from different cultures, going back some centuries, assumed that women were not as smart as men.
 
Women are the smartest. I have some unique views on intelligence...I think.

I really think the whole "multiple" intelligences thing is bullshit; it was created to sell a lot of books and make less intelligent people feel good about their talents rather than intelligence. (nothing wrong with that) In fact, after high school and especially after college, I think intelligence matters far less than talent and motivation anyway.

I also think very few people are significantly above or below the average intelligence. People tend to perform well at what interests them. If they simply can't get interested in a typical intelligence test, they probably won't score highly. The whole issue is also very obscured by personal agendas - if someone pretends to be stupid so a "smarter" person does work for them, who's really smarter? ;)
 
Strawberry_lovemuffin said:
I read today that Australian scientists have discovered that the part of the brain which controls language and communication is 20% bigger in women than in men.

Aha! Scientific proof of why we always win arguments ;)


verbal skills generally develop much faster than boys. At the most basic level, girls learn to speak much earlier.


Strawberry_lovemuffin said:
Women and men are smart in different ways, it's that simple.

*shrug* ditto
 
I read today that Australian scientists have discovered that the part of the brain which controls language and communication is 20% bigger in women than in men.

Aha! Scientific proof of why we always win arguments

Nah, we're simply smart enough to give in and pretend you won. :p
 
Strawberry_lovemuffin said:
I read today that Australian scientists have discovered that the part of the brain which controls language and communication is 20% bigger in women than in men.
Well altough you think you have won the argument, due to our more logical brains we are in fact laughing at the flimsy logic you used. lol ;) :p

In my experience once you can rubbish a womans logic in an argument she turns on one of the female brains most powerful tools, denial mode. Hence automatic win for her. heheh

[post purely for entertainment! don't want any women lynching me]
 
dark_stars said:
is it big feet or tiny girl?

both; but also the camera position makes the feet look even bigger than usual. if i remember it was my maid who took the photo ( if not her then one of the "angels" but certainly not i ).

just saw her tonight for only the 3rd time in maybe > 2 months. like each other meeting zero physical contact except to give her money. i think she graduates from high school sometime in the next 40 hours or so.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/Cigar/CA_Archives/CA_Show_Article/0,2322,1413,00.html

On Jan 17, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Alan ***** wrote:

dear michael,

sorry to take so long to thank you for the article. one of my staff managed to somehow convert it to a .pdf file so i emailed it to many of my friends and posted it on a couple of bulletin boards.

like some of the comments i have copied from BB's below i thought it was very well written and a good read. really no negative feedback at all ( except from the CEO of ******* who came across it in an airport lounge and nearly choked on his croissant --- due to the girlie bar comments just as i was about to become a significant shareholder in ******* ).

anyway thanks again.

regards, alan

Having finished reading the whole thing - I must say it is a fascinating look into the world - that journalist did a good job writing it.

thanks for the article. it was a great read and a much appreciated insight into the life of .... .....

Very much enjoyed the artical. The fact that it is basically accurate makes it all the more enjoyable.

Great read, have had a look over the magazine, and you come up great in colour Alan.

I loved the quotes about your evenings at Makati in BIG BOLD letters on the top of page 172.

A bit more info on the girly bars would've been ideal but other then that it was a great article !

yes Dad, the article is great, so when is the movie?

I'd be interested to know, given past experiences you've had with journalists, whether you were satisfied with the accuracy with which you were represented.

that has crossed my mind several times joe, as there is really nothing there that he has represented inaccurately. very rarely have i seen an article that did not contain inaccuracies.

the Manila "money in the sneakers" story is a bit incoherent but that is about the worst i can say.

yesterday Nicam said it had an error where it reported $7m as out biggest win but a quick browse now only finds reference to an $8m win whilst i was in Cebu, with andrew and phil turner, and it does not say it was the biggest.


"How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius

"If you are patient in one moment of anger, you will escape a hundred days of sorrow." Chinese Proverb
 
This leads me to believe that men are, overall, smarter than women -- ie, the average man is smarter than the average woman.

not according to helen fisher ..

fascist gasbag

mind you that if it could ever be conclusively proven that either gender is biologically superior to the other..it would automatically become a powerful argument in favour of racism and other forms of discrimination...

the idea that there has to be a superior sex stems from the pervasive right-wing ideology of biological inequality..which in turn justifies imposing power...and even without helen fisher..it is painfully clear that feminists in general have defined "equality" in the sense of destructive competition..which forces them to embrace right-wing ideologies..such as the existence of a superior sex...
 
I personally know more ignorant guys than I do girls but I wouldn’t consider us woman as a group, to be more intelligent than guys or vise versa. I feel that each of us are just more capable in different ways! Seriously, if you think about it, we females would have a difficult time getting by with out you guys and you guys would have a difficult time without us as well.

I consider this thread to have a lot of male attributes in that, it hasn’t clearly defined weather or not this gender specific intelligence is for the betterment of society but rather, the sole gratification to have the label “More intelligent than the other”. Most men are primal competitors and I am not surprised that a lot of you are attempting to establish dominance over us in this thread because it’s in your nature but that doesn’t give *some of* you the right to generalize with such blind ignorance and make us woman look like complete idiots just to establish a meaningless label. Lets talk about ‘Intelligence that betters society’ rather than ‘Intelligence’ in general because lets face it, there is a LOT of intelligence that is simply meaningless…and perhaps you guys posses more of that kind of intelligence than we do (?) in that case..YAY you guys win!
 
fizzygirl said:
My proposal still (and again) holds.
On the other tangent, there is still not a total agreement of what composes "intellgence"

snip

, then we could indeed say one sex was more intelligent than the other. We could also say one race was more intelligent, or that one country was more intelligent or one age level.
[ 22 February 2002: Message edited by: fizzygirl ]

re your first sentence i think there would substantial agreement that it is "the g factor" as defined by Jensen.

IQ tests are calibrated so that the average for both males and females averages 100 but someitmes they get out of whack and then males seem to average 2 points higher.

anyway as others ( and p'raps even myself have pointed out ) the curve is steeper for females than males. 2 other ways of expressing this are to say the SD is higher for males than females or that males predominate at both ends of the curve.

it is all genetic!

so all your counter examples are indeed true.

at he higher levels males do have a higher "g factor".

some races are more intelligent than others.

some countries are more intelligent than others.

some ages are more intelligent than others. apart form the Flynn Effect which suggests an increase in "g factor" of around 4 points per decade it is suggested that beyond about age 40 the average person might lose 1 IQ point every year.

but all this digresses from my main point.

on the Larry King live show i saw an interview with Bill Maher ( an American comedian who i consider very very intelligent ) in which he semi seriously suggested the southern states were less intelligent than the rest of the US and p'raps their votes should be discounted ( paraphrasing ).

whilst googling on this subject months ago i came across a study ( in a 1st world European country ) that suggested IQ scores in rural areas were 10 points lower than in the cities.

logic would suggest same could well be true as the smarter types from the rural areas would tend to migrate to the cities leaving a depleted gene pool ( IQ wise ) across many decades or centuries.

food for thought ??

digressing again >>>

http://www.asianracing.nu/vb/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1954
 
Last edited:
If we want to operationally define the factor we are talking about, and equate intelligence with "doing well on 'x' text", then we could indeed say one sex was more intelligent than the other. We could also say one race was more intelligent, or that one country was more intelligent or one age level. But, in reality, we would be saying that they performed better on a certain measure.
I just wanted to add this as the full quote, as I most certainly do NOT believe that one race, gender, country, etc is necessarily more intelligent than another.
 
Research that I have done on this topic says this:

men are "smarter" when it comes with immediate decisions. As in, when asked a question they will come up with a better more correct answer immediately, as opposed to women. Women, however, will come up with a better answer given more time.

Why/How is this relevant?

Especially in the workplace, researchers have concluded that when you need an immediate answer, go to a man. When you have a long term project, or have a question that gives more time for an answer, go to a woman.
 
Of course women arent smarter, if they were they would be ruling the world. With the Power of the "P", they have control over men, and if used correctly there is no stopping them. Thank god that women havent figured this out yet! Some have, and more are figuring it out as time goes on...Future of men will probably be nothing more than sex slaves. But then i ask myself, is that a bad thing? ;)
 
wanderer21 said:
Research that I have done on this topic says this:
Especially in the workplace, researchers have concluded that when you need an immediate answer, go to a man. When you have a long term project, or have a question that gives more time for an answer, go to a woman.

I'd love to see the citations for your research. My years of experience as an extremely solution-oriented legal administrative professional has taught me *not* to beat around the bush and to answer questions according to how they are presented, with reference to the subject matter at hand.

I've seen precious little science in this thread (with the exception of fizzy and xtcxtc, awesome posts you 2) and tons of speculation. I'd like to see more science, please.

Was that concise enough for everyone? ;)

And SHATT- The day I count on my pussy to get me somewhere in this world would be a sad day indeed. Many of us females have no problem standing on our own two feet in the business world with our legs firmly shut.
 
Top