blahman8000
Bluelighter
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 690
She also brought up something that seemed a bit pointed towards me - intellectuals tend to have a much harder time with 12 step programs because they are quite simple, and people of an intellectual bent want to analyze it, understand why it works, etc. In her opinion, they try to make things more complicated than they actually are, and this interferes with what is a very simple, albeit difficult, process.
Not really sure how I'd respond if someone said this to me. I tried AA and didn't get a whole lot out of it. I'm sure my sobriety would have remained intact had I not gone. It was a good experience to listen to others and to speak my mind, but overall, it didn't have very much healing effect (if any) nor do I feel the need to show up very often. I think it's a little concerning that someone would shoot down those who opt to try and gain an understanding of a program that they're expected to depend on so much in the face of addiction. It sounds like she's simply asking you not to think too much about the flaws in AA and is considering it a flaw on your part to actually rationalize whether or not something is good for you.
For me, AA is a place I can go to if I want to speak my mind and go somewhere on a Saturday night instead of sitting at home craving a drink. And for that reason, it can be helpful. But beyond that, I don't really depend on it for anything else. I can't really seem to wrap my head around the "higher power" deal, no matter how many ways they explain it to me. And I haven't really followed the 12 steps at all. Certainly, though, others can get something helpful out of it. I've seen a lot of people swear by AA after nothing else worked for them. To each his own.

