Wilson Wilson
Bluelighter
Actually it is... the R6 subs (AL-LAD, ETH-LAD, PRO-LAD, etc) are more difficult to synth than LSD, in fact until recent techniques were developed they required you to produce LSD and then further react the LSD into AL-LAD/etc. The yields from the precursors are also much lower than for LSD. For this reason, the produces of AL-LAD and ETH-LAD have stated they will not produce any more as it is not economically viable, so those two are likely to go the way of the unicorn soon too, unless someone else decides to do it.
I'm not saying it's not possible, it certainly is and in fact I'd be surprised if some of the brilliant minds synthesizing LSD and distributing it back then weren't experimenting with other lysergamides too. Just saying, it's notably more difficult and less efficient. My guess is at least that the vast majority of cases of people saying "this acid is different than that acid" is due to placebo/the power of suggestion, which, as you say, is a particularly powerful factor with psychedelics. In fact in psychedelic research before the demonization of psychedelics, there was tremendous variation in the style of trips, incidence of bad trips, and incidence of powerful/life-changing experiences simply based on the way and the setting in which the drug was administered. When people were guided and told to expect a positive/spiritual experience, and told how to navigate the experience if/when it got difficult, the incidence of life-changing trips increased hugely compared to when the drug was given with no guidance in a cold, clinical environment (or the horrid experiments done on prisoners with it), and the incidence of bad trips was greatly reduced. In all cases though, it was pure, pharmaceutical-grade LSD. Modern research bears this out, too. The power of suggestion is extremely powerful with psychedelics. Trying to attribute bad trips to something besides LSD and good trips to LSD is missing a big part of the entire picture with psychedelics in general.
Fair play I didn't know that. When AL-LAD hit the RC scene and was all legal over here it was being sold far cheaper than LSD so I assumed it wasn't more difficult to make. I guess then the price difference is explained by the fact LSD is more pricey due to being on the black market. Although surely the same, presumably highly controlled, precursors must be used to create both? It must truly be down to the lack of legal risk in creating and transporting the finished product.
But yes I agree with what you say about the placebo effect. After all both the CIA and Charles Manson used the stuff for mind control, successfully too I might add. Well sort of. MKULTRA is more complex than shoving LSD down someone's gob and mind controlling them. Manson was able to use it to his advantage because he had willing subjects. You can hypnotise anyone if they are a willing subject. LSD certainly helps a lot but isn't necessary, just a "shortcut" if you like. The CIA did experiments on some willing subjects that were successful, but as far as we know they were unable to hypnotise unwilling subjects. That being said, we only know of a very small number of the documented MKULTRA experiments, the vast majority of the documents were destroyed. So ya never know.
Anyway back on topic... if as you say it's only recent synthesis methods that made AL-LAD production viable, it is more likely placebo than mass production of AL-LAD with the yellow tabs. I am guessing the modern AL-LAD production is no longer viable simply because it's now illegal in most countries where it was once sold as an RC.