Lol, look at his previous posts. He’s posted links. His name is freely available as is his uni….And which I would find where if I may be so bold (and lazy) as to ask?
Apologies for lateness - absolutely - @Skeebs has our full support. This last part of the project relates to the early parts -- it's a culmination of the work.@Tronica i know you’ve commented on @Skeebs past studies. Just wondering if you and @neversickanymore have looked into this current one and could give BLs opinion?
Might help OP/BL.
I clicked the link and this was fully explained. If you participate and disclose your accounts you get to see a demonstration of their work in action based off your data. If you choose to remain anonymous.. like that even exists anymore.. then your given a demonstration based off an anonymous person’s results.But wait I want to see my data, how do I get it?
That's not a bad idea actually, aside from the public part. Problem is, In Jabberwocky posts which are quoted or have a quote the original name can be seen quite often, and there's plenty of members active say 5 years or more who could volunteer regardless. An intentional change in acct might be more obfuscating an actual progression anyway wouldnt it? Hellfire!I just had a brilliant idea. If you wanna see if this thing works: run it on that Jabberwocky account and then cross reference the posts with currently (reincarnated) active members. How's that for a "control" test!Proof of concept no? But the results have to be made public of course!
Actually not that dumb of a suggestion nor my simply taking the piss (although that was the initial intention I'll admit).
Think about this:
There's more than a few members who have been around for decades and under not such ideal circumstances that may have been posting under different usernames and who may have, by now, cleaned up their act somewhat and are posting with a new account. Guess my point being: to what extent would substance abuse, or even specific substances, obfuscate somebody's written communication style (Tweakers need not respond here i.e. AI not required for analysis).
wish I could say the same... but hey... statute of limitations right?I haven't posted stuff here that would ruin me if it came out, so I don't care particularly care tbh.