maybe they're not needlessly elaborate. maybe they're exactly as elaborate as guy ritchie needed them to be?

alasdair

alasdair
then, maybe, they are needlessly elaborate not in terms of Guy Ritchie and his needlessly elaborate way of thinking, but rather in terms of the person who said they are needlessly elaborate and his non-needlessly elaborate way of thinking
(maybe)
![]()
I don't know if your comment was directed towards me, CoffeeDrinker. I don't think there is a problem. Nor do I think anyone is taking anything out on anyone. I do, however, enjoy crushing up ritalin pills and snorting them. If I could convince a doctor I had ADHD, I would. By the way, on a side note, isn't drinking coffee so common that it's meaningless? I mean you might as well be called Urinator or GuyWhoEatsCheeseOccasionally.
L2R, the remake of 12 Angry wasn't bad. I'll give you that.
I personally think the person who said they are needlessly elaborate has a needlessly non-elaborate way of thinking which needs him to not need elaboration.
it had tony danza in it, therefore it wins![]()
i think there's a temptation to try to (over) analyse an elaborate plot as it unfolds. as such, it's easy to get bogged down in a plot moment, and miss something while you're doing that. 10 minutes of that and you're lost.And once you stick with it it all comes together.
I met Tony Danza in a restaurant once! He was really nice and really short. Cool story over here.
I can't stand Christina Hendrick's character on Mad Men. We know you're hot, Joan. Get over yourself.
but all this is superficial and unimportant. she's not a bad actress, i have nothing against her at all. i like her in the show.