I could care less about stepping on toes. I am talking about the effective implementation of promoting harm reduction policy.Fry-d- said:I am quite aware he has stepped on more than one set of toes but some seem to be of the idea he has contributed nothing at all which is far from the truth.
And your remards about"me" and EDD proves that you haven't a clue as to what it is that I am talking about.Fry-d- said:Catch has contributed an incredible amount to bluelight you are not giving him respect for; don't use one inconsideration (edd) as a reflection of a life’s work.
I have no bias here but I think this witch hunt is definitely not in the best interest of bluelight.
starlightgemini said:Just a quick note:
I edited the title so that people could see that SD responded, and they could locate his response easily (at this point there are tons of responses to sift through).
Also, a thank you to SD for taking so much time to respond to this thread.
skydancer said:I hadn't addressed this but it deserves another Q. It is a simple name change and not a takeover. We are not shooting moderators or users. Currently the forum is titled "Drug Discussion" but it is more social in nature and this has generated complaints. This causes misinformation and confusion to the naive user and that has been the reason to address it. There have been other examples of forums with ambiguous or unclear purposes and this makes a forum not realize its potential.
So if the regular users want to talk about drugs, a new forum will be created specifically for that purpose. There will now be two forums, one of which would be just the social aspects from EDD, and one will be focused on serious drug questions, and both audiences have the most appropriate environment. Someone who is interested in both simply can post in multiple forums (just like all other regional forums at Bluelight).
And if people do not care for a serious drug forum, the forum will become a social forum and people can chat freely without interfering with people looking for drug information (because these people would be specifically redirected to the drug forums).
xtcxtc said:user options allows one to vary how many posts appear per page so it is NOT on page 14 for me ( nor will it be for anyone not using the default option of posts / page ).
i have edited my opening post to provide a link to SD's response >>
http://www.bluelight.ru/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2759262#post2759262
you might wish to reconsider the edit to the title.
starlightgemini said:I just noticed that xtcxtc no longer has "benefactor" under his name, but is now just "bluelighter"
what happened?![]()
![]()
Roger&Me said:Skydancer gave the exact response I expected him to: "shut the fuck up and deal with it."
He obviously doesn't get the point. Or maybe he does, and just doesn't care.
frizzantik said:regarding communication, please note that the administrators are now responsible for communicating announcements and changes to the staff and users for all forums.
Spencer said:
We now officially know that at least part of the Senior administration doesn't care about a great many of the users on the board. By assigning a PR Admin to handle the dispersal of public information, they would never have to assoiciate with an end user ever again. They would only have to deal directly with one or two admins. Then, rather than treat the populous like children with "Because I said so, now leave me alone" answers, the users can be treated with respect like the adults that (most) of them are.
Grep said:Excellent, now that everything is sorted out in the food chain, can EDD please be left alone?
SmC said:That is all we ask. Or do we all have to commit mass suicide in order for that to happen?:D