After approval it will most likely be as common as non alcoholic drinks. Not legal yet.
Now I'm highly intrigued. Another rabbit hole to travel down. Vaguely remember it I the press - from what I remember, it seemed to me that he shouldn't have gotten the jail.
I’m afraid in Bristol the main thing you can still smell is the great unwashed, squatters with “dredz” and wannabe hipsters.
Who is out there buying nonalcoholic gin ???
I know someone who likes it . Probably just enjoying the placebo effect.
yeah the place has become a bit of a parody of itself for sure, but still a very cool city that does definitely reek of weed!
Overall harm to others score for methamphetamine looks off to me. Is it just a UK chart?If anyone who can look at this chart he did and think he's anything other than a fart sniffing academic quack , I can't help you
Butane, which can just kill you randomly, less dangerous than other drugs to the user?
At some point benzos were involved in something absurd like half the murders in Scotland, but they're less dangerous to others than tobacco?
I'd guess that he didn't take into account the amount of people actually using each drug when making the chart, but surely that's a pretty basically thing that should be taken into account?
There was a drug impurity included in some synthetic opioid in the 1970s that gave you permanent parkinsons if you took it once, is that less dangerous than alcohol because nobody in the UK uses it?
Also the "Ecstasy is less dangerous than riding a horse" thing was always moronic. In chances of dying, maybe, but riding a horse is not neurotoxic like use of MDMA is.
The tests were repeated in Europe..same resultIf anyone who can look at this chart he did and think he's anything other than a fart sniffing academic quack , I can't help you
Butane, which can just kill you randomly, less dangerous than other drugs to the user?
At some point benzos were involved in something absurd like half the murders in Scotland, but they're less dangerous to others than tobacco?
I'd guess that he didn't take into account the amount of people actually using each drug when making the chart, but surely that's a pretty basically thing that should be taken into account?
There was a drug impurity included in some synthetic opioid in the 1970s that gave you permanent parkinsons if you took it once, is that less dangerous than alcohol because nobody in the UK uses it?
Also the "Ecstasy is less dangerous than riding a horse" thing was always moronic. In chances of dying, maybe, but riding a horse is not neurotoxic like use of MDMA is.
You should see some of the injuries you get from horses especially if there are jumps. Much worse than anything xtc could do provided you don't take a stupid amount at once.If anyone who can look at this chart he did and think he's anything other than a fart sniffing academic quack , I can't help you
Butane, which can just kill you randomly, less dangerous than other drugs to the user?
At some point benzos were involved in something absurd like half the murders in Scotland, but they're less dangerous to others than tobacco?
I'd guess that he didn't take into account the amount of people actually using each drug when making the chart, but surely that's a pretty basically thing that should be taken into account?
There was a drug impurity included in some synthetic opioid in the 1970s that gave you permanent parkinsons if you took it once, is that less dangerous than alcohol because nobody in the UK uses it?
Also the "Ecstasy is less dangerous than riding a horse" thing was always moronic. In chances of dying, maybe, but riding a horse is not neurotoxic like use of MDMA is.
There are not as many death/ serious injuries from mdma compared with horse riding ( with jumps)..
can someone take the 50p out of this dickhead? Quite clearly a shillYea sure
Yeah I suppose there were all sorts. I remember seeing a leaflet put out by the police in Scotland which showed what was in pills they seized. The "NTZ"s I remember being notorious containing etizolam as did many because I suppose OCGs purchased the powder in bulk before the NPA/blanket ban on "research chemicals" and pressed them into pills. But those ones in particular were so strong that people thought they contained rohypnol. The flyer I mentioned showed that they had etizolam. Many of them did but some contained weird synthetic opioids too. It probably was about 10 years ago that the bizzies and drug workers and such realised that there was a "street valium" problem so Nutt's list would have to be updated now given the danger of benzos, especially street benzos. But it's more the combination that's dangerous in terms of all the ODs than benzos themselves, given that they aren't easy to OD on by themselves AFAIK. The addiction element is obviously highly dangerous and it doesn't look like Nutt took that into account.