FFS. Ali has a title under his name. This either means something, as he wants it to, or it doesn't. I'm asking that 'title' for an apology that involves saying 'the management' got it wrong, on several levels. If you, Bear, want to see Ali as BL, that's your concern. If Ali is too unprofessional to recognise what I'm saying, then remove the fucking title, it's a joke to everyone else anyway, not least XTCXTC, the original benefactor of BL, who specifically argued against such bullshit titles. But if Ali wants to retain that, for what can only be his own ego reasons, then do what a businessman with that title would do and act like a PR man. Which isnt what he's doing.
Things went wrong. Badly. For several reasons I'm being polite in not dragging up and going over again in detail. The result is this place is a morgue. If you two both prefer ignoring that and playing politics against me, then that says more about you than me.
FFS. We all have a title under our name don't we. What do you want exactly ?
Who is this 'management' that you seem your entitled for an apology from ? Ok - because XTCXTC hasn't formally apologized to you because of the way that Evey was managed you have your knickers in a twist and nothing is going to appease you.
Ali has been very professional - he has addressed your concerns and has answered you questions. Your arguments lately have simply been towards the title of Ali and not about what he is doing for the site.
Are you honestly telling me that I have ignored the reasons behind why this section is quiet ? If you care to check I gave my reasons very clearly - if you care to check my posting history you will see that I have addressed the reason for the last few years. If you care to check this very thread I addressed the problems why this section was quiet and specifically mentioned the bullshit that surrounded 'Evey'.
I have never ignored your posts, I have misunderstood them and had a drunken hissy fit (Press tv) but I have never dismissed your opinion - but please do not tell me that I have ignored the problem in this section.