could be he's provide some helpful but not necessarily earth shattering information in relation to civil rights and the like to get people comfortable with his presence and intentions
[....] for some one's who's provide such hugely detailed and seemingly accurate information up to this point, even offered to teach people how to conceal gear at one stage, to go in this direction doesn't make sense
etcetera etcetera
this thread reeks of misinformation. almost seems like a bit of a slip on his part
All I have to say to you is this.
Shmeh.
Overthink/overanalyse whatever you so choose. I gave a practical (and impotantly, genuine) anecdote which demonstrated that even the absolute bottom rung of the import ladder is worth attention. If you want to characterise that as some hamfisted segue to or from my previous postings on this forum, have fun with it.
A slip? If I were involved in some elaborate plan as you set out later, why would I 'slip'? Would my charade not be so expertly coreographed to preclude someone such as your good self 'digging' at my 'facade'? Life, and one's writings, are not so coreographed. A number of my life's little 'speed bumps' are documented throughout my posts. If you choose to beleive that these are all mere illusion or some sort of amalgam between truth and fiction, I have no mechanism to disprove your belief, and I am certainly not going to start rattling off names, dates, places or more explicit information in the hopes of appeasing you.
it's not paranoid, paranoia is irrational, this is a plausible scenario as far as i can tell...someone set me straight if not?
might not be a sworn officer but quite possibly an analyst working for victoria police, or a player in a game orchestrated by the hr crew to discourage illegal activity on the site?
I'll give you that... its a plausible scenario. However, its not the case in this circumstance. I'm not employed by any police service, nor am I involved with the site's admins in any way, shape or form. Readers are free to take what I say as gospel or decry it as dangerous fiction. That's the reader's call. That said, if you are thinking my information to be fictitious or designed at achieve some sort of sinister, underhanded result, this is the first time its been brought up by anyone in this forum in my 12 months of membership, so if nothing else, congrats on picking up on an incisive (though erroneous) take on my motivations.
now he's painting the typical propagandist picture of an impenetrable border.
WTF? This is teh internets. Feel free to post your personal information if you're so inclined. I'll stick with keeping mine off the radar if its all the same to you.
he's also offered to recommended people a good criminal lawyer in melbourne....could be an intelligence op, get you down there basically admitting you're up to no good if you're looking to keep him on a retainer (why else would you need a criminal lawyer) and start a file on you
OK... now this is just getting outright farcical. The person to whom those seeking to be referred were referred is a legal practitioner whose name and phone number can be verified online... those with referrals got a discount. I'm aware of this practitioner appearing in court on two occassions for at least one member on here.
No disrespect to you spok, but seriously, this assertion is just stupid. You must only need a criminal lawyer if you're a criminal? Get real.
