• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Father, photographer, Child Pornographer.

Why? Surely context matters far more than state of dress, no? There is no doubt that folk of certain predilictions will wank over more or less anything that happens to fuel their fantasies. That could be a perfectly innocent family snapshot of a newborn lying on the changing mat pissing in their own mouth (which is a "thing" in itself not some fetish I just created incidentally,) or could be the kids clothing section of a catalogue, or could be footage of the nativity play at school, or could be a random pic of a random kid fully dressed with no obvious sexual connotations whatsoever. Unless you are seriously suggesting all pix of all children should be banned from public view then we are back to it all being in the eye of the beholder. So stop beholding it in "that way" and it is no longer an issue.
 
Owens argument, is the parents have seen him naked before so its ok to take pics?? does owen not realise these pictures are published to the whole web?!?!? I certainly don't want my naked kiddie pics broadcast over the Internet!!

...though might do it for a reasonable price if Sammy_G comes up with decent offers. really skint atm
 
What all of u don't seem to realise on this thread... is naked kiddies is natural, around a family....



....not the broader public, which is why people are taking offense to these pictures
 
I won't, and it doesn't make it right for you to either. A baby girl, naked on a potty is a private moment. You have no right to see it. You're just taking advantage of the ineptitude of the father.
 
It's only wrong to share such a photo because the child has no say in the matter, not because there is anything inherently wrong about child nudity.
 
The child has no say in the matter for any picture of any child posted online or anywhere else. This is a perfectly fine viewpoint to take as long as it's consistent and you'd agree that all pix of all children should be blanket banned online and offline. Otherwise we're back to it being purely cos the child is nekkid not because they have no say in the matter.

Raas: I have no interest in looking at the pix. Not cos they're of a nekkid child but cos they're of a stranger's child. Same reason I have no interest in looking pix of strangers in general unless I have good reason to.
 
Creepy_McGee said:
You idiot. There's a difference between your parents seeing you naked as a kid, and... THE ENTIRE WORLD WIDE WEB
Click to expand...

You'd throw your Bible in disgust at some of the doofs I've been to then. Naked kids every where

In fact I can't recall a party growing up where my parents didn't end up naked in the pool with their mates.
 
^ I spent what seems (in memory) entire summers spent nekkid in the garden eating mud and splashing around in a paddling pool. So did everybody I know of who was born pre-tabloid Paedogeddon hysteria.

class-a-team said:
That's what I've been saying all along.
Click to expand...

Good on ya then - nice to see a consistent position amongst so much hypocrisy from others who haven't the balls to not be disingeneous about the nudity thing.
 
Shambles said:
Also, of some relevance here (also fekkin hilarious and always worth a post)...



<3
Click to expand...


27 mins, no thanks. make ur point a little more concise, pleasies :D
One Thousand Words said:
You'd throw your Bible in disgust at some of the doofs I've been to then. Naked kids every where

In fact I can't recall a party growing up where my parents didn't end up naked in the pool with their mates.
Click to expand...

OK fine, you party animal you... just don't show the whole fucking world wide web pics of you + nekkid kiddies, as we've already had to endure u and ur wife as it is
 
I'd be more concerned with zoos to be honest. Naked animals every where. Some are even having sex.


h5ADDBE3B
 
^ Humans are animals. They are primates. Apes. Apes are animals last I checked, no?

One Thousand Words said:
I still do :(
Click to expand...

Nobody... ;)

One Thousand Words said:
I'd be more concerned with zoos to be honest. Naked animals every where. Some are even having sex.
Click to expand...

And so, so much worse :|



Creepy_McGee said:
27 mins, no thanks. make ur point a little more concise, pleasies :D
Click to expand...

I could. It most definitely wouldn't be as worthy of your time though so try the linkies ;)
 
Most psychologist are no more accurate than astrologists.

Then again the Bible is a text passed on by mouth for 500 yrs so I don't really think accuracy is your strong point either
 
Creepy_McGee said:
You idiot. There's a difference between your parents seeing you naked as a kid, and... THE ENTIRE WORLD WIDE WEB
Click to expand...

Not really, if it was an innocent pic of me as a kid naked it wouldn't make a difference to how I felt, especially if my father was a photographer by trade. It's just perfectly innocent art, if some peado somewhere wants to crack one out that's their look out. It's sad that we live in a world where such innocent things can't happen in public for fear of peadophilia. It's weird, paranoid lunacy.
 
Creepy_McGee said:
Owens argument, is the parents have seen him naked before so its ok to take pics?? does owen not realise these pictures are published to the whole web?!?!? I certainly don't want my naked kiddie pics broadcast over the Internet!!

...though might do it for a reasonable price if Sammy_G comes up with decent offers. really skint atm
Click to expand...


The naked pictures of me in her house are there for everyone that walks through the door to see, I couldn't give a fuck. It's just perfectly innocent real life stuff, kids often like running around naked, and there's nothing perverse in recording this stage of their development in the same way a parent might want to record any other stage of their development.

You my friend, are what is commonly called a prude.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top