Father, photographer, Child Pornographer.

[joe90]

You are a major shit stirrer Raas. It's amusing sometimes but you do stir many pots.

 

[Allein]

You are a major shit stirrer Raas. It's amusing sometimes but you do stir many pots.

Indeed

Anyway apologies, I was just passing on a message rather than accusing u mystelf, but now received another message saying it was not meant to be public. Allein has beaten me to editing my post, perhaps some of urs should be snipped also. (post that is)

Public posting here is hardly the only form of communication open to you, Creepy or anyone else and particularly in this case the whole He said She said is at the very least ill considered.

I'm only responding here as you seem so keen on eluding to my polite PM, which you haven't responded to privately, publicly 8)

All that said....apology accepted

 

[Raasyvibe]

You are a major shit stirrer Raas. It's amusing sometimes but you do stir many pots.

I thought it was fair critique and falsely assumed it was wanted to be made public along with the e-mail address request. I soon saw this was wrong, and publicly apologised to SHM to diffuse the post. That is not shit stirring.

Indeed


...



Public posting here is hardly the only form of communication open to you, Creepy

If SHM is to talk publicly about his infractions, why can't I publicly respond? Feel that you're being a little impartial here.

I'm only responding here as you seem so keen on eluding to my polite PM, which you haven't responded to privately, publicly 8)

Actually, if you check the times, your PM arrived after my public response. And in my public response, I said it was posted in error and SHM may like to respectively remove his post.

 

[Allein]

I thought it was fair critique and falsely assumed it was wanted to be made public along with the e-mail address request. I soon saw this was wrong, and publicly apologised to SHM to diffuse the post. That is not shit stirring.

We are entitled to our own opinions, sometimes it's useful to read an objective one...no ?

If SHM is to talk publicly about his infractions, why can't I publicly respond? Feel that you're being a little impartial here.

I didnt remove either so I can't see how that suggest bias

Actually, if you check the times, your PM arrived after my public response. And in my public response, I said it was posted in error and SHM may like to respectively remove his post.

What the response where you referenced my PM, I'm unclear as to what the hell your going on about....you posted it, I removed it and polity requested you refrain from posting such things....move one, I have.

Now your welcome to the last word, which I have no doubt you'll have to have.

 

[Raasyvibe]

We are entitled to our own opinions, sometimes it's useful to read an objective one...no ?

Nope. My opinion was removed by you as " he said she said drivel", remember? Slanderous accusations by others towards me, of course, are fine and you concur with them (re: joe's comment).

I didnt remove either so I can't see how that suggest bias

Yes you did. You edited my remarks on his infraction, as they're "drivel" and kept all of his live.

What the response where you referenced my PM, I'm unclear as to what the hell your going on about....you posted it, I removed it and polity requested you refrain from posting such things....move one, I have.

You gave me the rolly eye treatment...

8)

as I, in your own words: "so keen on eluding to my polite PM, which you haven't responded to privately, publicly 8)". Now check the times of your "polite PM" and my "public response", and you'll see that the public response came first. So, at the time of writing there was no PM to elude and you are wrong to give me the rolly eye treatment.

Now your welcome to the last word, which I have no doubt you'll have to have.

No need for such pettiness, observed through most of your late posts towards me.

You've been a right pain ever since I rejected your informal warning about supposedly deliberately winding up Evey, and she rejected it also. Face up to the fact you were wrong, judgemental and unfounded in your "concerns" and stop being so childish across the forum because of it.



















Now anyone else wanna good rebukin'!?

 

[joe90]

Are you still talking about photographs ?

 

[Allein]

Are you still talking about photographs ?

Quite right, conversing with Creepy was....Creepy anyhow.

Now is this a Weasel or is it a Stoat :--

Spoiler: I'll save you a postcard

if it looks like a Weasel, smells like a Weasel and sounds like a Weasel........

 

[HouseFever]

It looks like a young beaver to me.

 

[StoneHappyMonday]

Pretty sure thats a weasel. I ate beaver in Chile/Patagonia. Was tasty. But boy can you tell they live on wood.

 

[Shambles]

Look, I'm not bitter, honest (everybody else lies on here so I thought I'd give it a go), and I'm not calling for shambles to be banned but how come I got banned for a month for calling Evey a stupid bitch, which she admitted, and now I'm seeing every other post from Shammy calling someone a fucking moron or self-delusional arse or some such?

That's not really for me to comment on as I really don't know the details of the comments you claim to have made nor the context of them. I will say that I am well aware that I often use forceful - even downright aggressive - language sometimes. I would suggest that (leaving aside the drunkenness thing which is no excuse if it happens too often) that when I do resort to such language it tends to be targeted at specific aspects of an individual's opinion rather than the person as a whole. This is presumably why some people also find me inconsistent in that in one thread I'll be bestest buddies with somebody whilst in another I'll call them a moron or whatever. If it makes you feel any better, I call staff of all levels morons and the like when I find specific opinions of theirs moronic too. On a purely beaurocratic level, posts generally have to be reported for any action to be taken too. Feel free (anybody) to report any of mine you feel to be inappropriate.

 

[StoneHappyMonday]

I'm not on about reporting you (or anyone) Shammy. I'm bitter at what I got banned for. 2 weeks for calling Evey a stupid bitch - for which I received FIVE separate emails congratulating me on my straight talking, and a PM from Evey admitting she was in the wrong. Then 4 more weeks for daring to ask a mod (Snolly) why I had got banned before. As stated, these emails, which Whoremoaning now holds, were not abusive. And in return I got an incredibly abusive email from Baooozs, which I cannot believe Ali didn't either agree with or know about, which called me 'one of the worst posters on BL who should have been banned long ago for my vile and malevolent behaviour'.

Add that to what I see now (and what I saw from others towards Evey while I was banned) and you might just understand why I feel a bit aggrieved.

 

[StoneHappyMonday]

Added to this I've just been shown another infracting email from Baooozs which makes me wonder how the hell he got anywhere near admin and wtf admin of BL think they are playing at these days.

Playing, like juvenile children, being the operative word. Shame you didn't show BL's managerial shit like that to Mike Power before he published his kind words on this website eh Ali?

 

[Shambles]

As I said, I can't comment on individual cases cos I can't possibly know all of the relevant details. I can say copies of at least some of the PMs involved are also held in staff forums and your interpretation is not how I'd interpret at least some of them. This is not a topic for public discussion though as you well know. Posting contents of PMs is considered very bad form and will often result in wrist-slapping of one form or another so is simply not a thing that can be publicly discussed. Whether this is a good or bad policy is perectly debatable but specifics are not. I'm sure you can imagine how much of a can of worms it would open if people were allowed to post contents of PMs.

I do totally understand the "speaking truth" aspect you suggest. I would argue that without all the facts it can come over as sheer bullying at worst or pointless personal attack at best. Use the ignore feature if anybody is that much of a problem to you ("you" in the general sense). Yes I know it has its issues too but it's the best we have currently to try to avoid this place becoming even more of a morass of interpersonal bullshit than it already is.

Everybody is subject to the BLUA. I won't deny that the BLUA is open to interpretation and even to abuse but will say there are many, many checks and balances in place which make it hard for any individual to be unfairly targeted to any major extent without it being very obvious and subject to wider discussion and debate. As has often been suggested, become a mod and find out for yourself. You could help to make a much more positive difference in site policy areas that way

 

[Allein]

It looks like a young beaver to me.

Pretty sure thats a weasel. I ate beaver in Chile/Patagonia. Was tasty. But boy can you tell they live on wood.

The thread is back on track but both of you are wrong in ways I dare not contemplate

 

[Shambles]

*awaits raas's calling out of allein as being a child pornographer*

 

[Allein]

*awaits raas's calling out of allein as being a child pornographer*

I was at least 16 before I had a camera of my own

 

[One Thousand Words]

Wow, SHM is acting like such a whiney bitch I'd think twice about leaving her in a room alone with jimmy Saville or rolph Harris.

 

[joe90]

Now lets get back to the Pirelli calendar child nudes edition chat

 

[StoneHappyMonday]

Wow, SHM is acting like such a whiney bitch I'd think twice about leaving her in a room alone with jimmy Saville or rolph Harris.

At least I can spell Rolf you twat. And Savile come to that. Now kindly fuck off.

 

[StoneHappyMonday]

some of the PMs involved are also held in staff forums and your interpretation is not how I'd interpret at least some of them.

Well just for that I might just be off to contact whoremoaning, who holds the PM's in question, just to prove you wrong.

Because you making statements like that, making them look like truths when you obviously know less than half-truths, just winds me up ooh, just a little fucking tiny bit you know.