Sim0n said:
I'm really not sure why you're posting in this thread. You don't like football (or at least the Premiership) fine. Don't post here. Start a thread about something that you do like.
Oh yes, that's what you said to Seuss wasn't it? 8(
You have a narrow definition of 'competitiveness'. Of course, in ANY league, in ANY sport, it is highly unusual for more than a couple of teams to end up fighting for the title. The difference, which you are ignoring, is that several teams outside of todays 'top four' ('top two'?) have won the league in the past prior to Murdochs millions. Ipswich, Derby, Aston Villa, Spurs for starters. Others had a chance at the start. Geddit?
Now you are happy with the concentration of millions in the hands of a few, because one of those few are your chosen one. Well done on picking a winner. They are, after all, 'your' Man Utd aren't they.
As for your claim,
I didn't know ANYONE who supported a team from their own area.
you clearly didn't look far. How on Earth do the likes of Exeter, Port Vale etc get thousands to turn up each week? You think they all travel from Newcastle (New Zealand?) to watch lower division football? Didn't you categorize West Ham as the "East London Nazis"? That would really please my (East London born and bred) Jewish socialist friends who follow West Ham.
Tell Seussy to go away with equal vigour ('football is all bollocks') and I'll stop right now.
Edit. FYI Simon, I love football (unlike Seuss). And it is my love of football which has me posting how much I hate the way Murdochs millions have ruined it.