Sammy G
Ex-Bluelighter
Well i pretty much agree with you that we should grow up and not need to join organised religions in an ideal world, but it's up to the individual, unless we start banning certain ideas - given that, i'd rather a christianity that engages with the modern world and evolves than not (though we can ban the actions we collectively disagree with).
...
^Dawkins' critiques of religion are simplistic in my view and don't reach the sophistication needed to deal fairly with the highest reaches of religious philosophy, preferring instead to choose easy abrahamic strawman targets. I'm on the 'side' of science, i just think dawkins' arguments, coming as they do from a specific reductionist angle, do a disservice to the whole sweep of science. And he's just unecesarrily insulting sometimes, (mostly to muslims these days it seems)
(also, his selfish gene ideas, which inform his work on religion (as well as modern social darwinism generally), are being steadily undermined/nuanced with advances in genetics/epigenetics, cell biology and complexity)
Love the way Dawkins characterised Northern Ireland as a purely religious conflict. Read some history, you fucking buffoon.
I once went out with a girl whose housemate was a Dawkins fanboy and said I had a 'bad aura'. His bedroom faced the bathroom, and I used to take pleasure in regularly 'anointing' his doorknob with a sprinkle of piss.