xtcxtc said:
PK Women are not smarter than men in general, nor are men smarter than women, the fact that some areas are more highly represented by men and others women comes down to way more complex issues than merely “oh they’re smarter” and it’s impractical to believe that just because the numbers of women playing chess at that level are lower than men that it has any bearing on the intelligence of the general populus.
populace --- but i mentioned nobel prizes, bridge and backgammon. also you don't find many female CEO's of fortune 500 cos. nor many self made millionaires. btw i know many male millionaires but zero female excluding those i have given the money to.
at the highest levels women are not competitive with men.
My point is that it's not due to intelligence - the factors bearing on why there are more men in those areas are so wide and varied, you can not simply say it is so
because men are smarter.
I also know many millionaires and have found that a much higher percentage of self made fortunes belong to females in their late twenties, and you can't mention fortune 500 companies without realising that even today, many companies are still of the "old boys club" and have a token female or two on the board to comply with regulations. The glass ceiling so to speak is not as evident today as it was ten years ago but it’s still there in many ways; this does not make women any less intelligent than men, it just makes the climb a little harder and therefore the desire has to be stronger.
But having money or being a CEO of a fortune 500 company doesn’t make you intelligent. Surely you must have some smarts to get there... then again, as I mentioned before: if you have enough desire to do something you’ll get there. There are many pursuits where women far outweigh the men in the success department.
I will always stand by the fact that you can have anything you want
if you desire it enough. Intelligence, whilst handy is
nothing without the motivation to use it.
A Nobel Prize, playing chess, bridge or backgammon, becoming a CEO of a fortune 500 company, although all worthwhile pursuits, are not anything I would aspire to; I have no doubt that if I put my mind to it I could achieve it and I’m sure many of my testing psychologists expected it

but the fact remains that unless it held any interest for me I would not be able to motivate myself to bring about that result.
Nothing that has been mentioned shows a mark of intelligence, it requires a high level of knowledge in a particular field but it does not require intelligence. Achieving the status of a world renowned expert in your field does not mean you are intelligent; men and women are found to have different value systems is if fair to say that women are nicer than men? Of course it isn’t.
A blanket statement that says men are smarter than women and qualifies itself with further assertions that become shaky at best when expanding viewpoints isn’t going to convince anyone.
If you prefer to view the world through the narrow window where those assertions are reality then perhaps yes we can make such a declaration... but factor in values, motivations, socioeconomic dynamics, availability of information and any of a million other possible influences and that statement and any reasoning that accompanies it is blown out of the water.
If you say that you believe intelligence is inherent and more prevalent in men, why do you measure that intelligence by achievements that all the other factors have a part in shaping? These benchmarks that you use to measure intelligence against aren’t exactly a large cross-section; you’ve picked male dominated fields and said that they are a standard for intelligence when intelligence itself has never been clearly defined.
Men are different to women - certainly, more inclined to be motivated towards tactical games and power - most likely, but born with more intelligence? It's highly doubtful.