• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

What about that Andrew Tate eh?

ageingpartyfiend said:
So, you tell your traveller / gyspy friends that you think that most of their kith and kin are thieves wihtout any honour and they agree with you. Ok.

Not gonna call you a liar, but knowing that community and culture as intimately as I do...I find that difficult to believe. No offense.
Click to expand...
I think it’s the context. I get away with it cuz they’re mates. Same as when I call my Pakistani mates tight and say pakis never want to pay snd always try to haggle. It’s true but said Jokingly
It’s like if u made a joke about me being an ex frack head I’d take it differently depending how u meant it
 
F.U.B.A.R. said:
WTF?

I refer you to page 1 of this thread where you were defending him to the hilt:








I put it to you, Mr.Tripsitter, that you are simply taking the piss. 😀
Click to expand...
I was not taking the piss. I broke out of my toxic group of people around me and realized I only followed tate cause they were. I use to hate tate last year.

Now i realize tate is brainwashing people.
 
I have done just that - went and read some HR/support threads, thank you for the good advice :)

And just for the record I was joking/being ironic about closing the thread. It was a joke with my opinion of AT put smack in the middle off it. Joke obviously seemed funny only to me. I am not for censorship.

I wish you a great day!
 
schizopath said:
Gypsies are dodgy... and water is wet.



bUT you cant say that! Fuck off and wake up to reality, idiot.
Click to expand...
I'm not entirely sure what's going on in this thread!

I'll just leave it with this - all gypsies are not dishonourable thieves. Fact.

In my subjective experience (which is reasonably extensive), I'd say 50%, minimum, are not. That's it.
 
Last edited:
ageingpartyfiend said:
I'm not entirely sure what's going on in this thread!

I'll just leave it with this - all gypsies are not dishonourable thieves. Fact.

In my subjective experience (which is reasonably extensive), I'd say 50%, minimum, are not. That's it.
Click to expand...

So a potential 50% are?

You fuckin racist :ROFLMAO:
 
AlsoTapered said:
I see you are unfamiliar with the use of irony.
Click to expand...

w01fg4ng said:
@TheLoveBandit
Click to expand...

200w.gif
 
When you offer someone a compliment on their Mustache and suddenly she's not your friend anymore.
He hee.
F*ck Tate. You can have him. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:
lol
 
Soso78 said:
Tate brothers donating money for aid in Palestine to help the victims
Click to expand...

Well, have pledged to donate. But while I'm not running down ANYONE who gives aid to those in need, I'm also aware that under Romanian law a business can nominate up to 20% of their tax bill to a charity.

So depending upon the turnover of their businesses, it might not actually cost them a penny.

That doesn't mean it's not the right thing to do but people presume that they are giving $200,000 of their post-tax income and unless they state that fact, I would reasonably ask how much they are taking out of their own pockets.

In short, a bit of a PR stunt unless they have quietly been giving 20% of their taxes to nominated charities for years...

I also recall him pledging $100 million to set up a charity to 'protect men from false accusations'. As yet no details of that have emerged.

I have no way of knowing if these statements were made in good faith, but his record isn't exactly spotless when it comes to making such pledges.
 
AlsoTapered said:
Well, have pledged to donate. But while I'm not running down ANYONE who gives aid to those in need, I'm also aware that under Romanian law a business can nominate up to 20% of their tax bill to a charity.

So depending upon the turnover of their businesses, it might not actually cost them a penny.

That doesn't mean it's not the right thing to do but people presume that they are giving $200,000 of their post-tax income and unless they state that fact, I would reasonably ask how much they are taking out of their own pockets.

In short, a bit of a PR stunt unless they have quietly been giving 20% of their taxes to nominated charities for years...

I also recall him pledging $100 million to set up a charity to 'protect men from false accusations'. As yet no details of that have emerged.

I have no way of knowing if these statements were made in good faith, but his record isn't exactly spotless when it comes to making such pledges.
Click to expand...
Good point.
So u can give 20% of ur tax bill to a charity instead of the tax man??
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top