Post #623 is the screenshot of the Excel file, linked in post #628. I think you're so desperate to believe I'm wrong you're not even bothering to read the post. I clearly stated in #623 that the following screenshot is from my Excel file, which has nothing to do with the other screenshots. The other screenshots do correlate with the data, they're clearly UK/GB/EngWa data sets.
so yet again, following repeated requests. you have not posted the data from the original screenshots that you posted. the data you have supplied does match a later screenshot of yours, but it was not the one i was requesting the data from, as per the quote below, and my request for the actual data that came from, before you posted the other screenshot (which does match).
none of this changes the fact that the data you have posted in support of your own conclusions, has, twice, undermined your conclusions. and yet, you dig in.
The ONS site is deliberately obtuse. Someone submitted a FOI request (there are numerous):
Deaths in the UK from 1990 to 2020
The following two snapshots are taken from ONS datasets compiled to XLS, obviously from other FOI requests. The figures differ slightly but you can see they are clearly based around the same dataset as the pattern correlates between the two snapshots and the table in the link above. Even on the ONS website the requests figures don't always match precisely between FOIs either.
Where's the pandemic. Again, apart from April/May 2020 (which we know is due to deliberate government/NHS policy killing people), where the fuck is the pandemic?
these are the screenshots i was requesting the data for, as you can tell by this request, and repeated ones afterwards before you posted your other table:
now. post the link to the exact tables you included images of here.
there are further requests for this data in posts 588, and 555.
i incorrectly assumed that you'd actually posted the data i requested repeatedly. you did not, and the data disagree yet again with the data you posted in these screenshots, and now that i can see your processing i can see not to trust it. i take responsibility for not having realised you had posted another screenshot. i had repeatedly requested the data for your original screenshots prior to this,
i do not take responsibility for the fact that you have repeatedly evaded posting the data for your original screenshots and have now twice posted data that undermines them.
i retract my request for the original data. you have wasted enough of my time and it is clear you don't have a dataset that supports your beliefs, otherwise you would have posted that instread of the two that contradict them.