bit harsh but they shouldn't be taking ICU beds off people who didn't bring this on themselves. especially given how much big pharma makes from that.
By this logic, obese people should be discriminated against in triage.
Obesity-related illness kills 650,000 people a year in the US and most of that is preventable (although the mainstream media never showed us a permanent daily total of those deaths racking up).
We know that obese people suffer from more medical conditions and put a ton (no pun intended) of strain onto the healthcare system in general. But that is a result of
their choices which they've brought on themselves. Why should we subsidize their laziness/addiction and have them take away resources from other people who do the right thing and look after their health?
Anyone not wishing to help themselves must have a poor survival instinct and is therefore a potential threat to our future evolution as a species.
Genocide fat people then?
for the billionth time. because medical science has improved.
this is actually your explanation for why there was no excess death during an alleged global pandemic? You got a chronic case of cognitive dissonance too bad there's no medication you can shoot into your arm to cure that.
Vaccinations are the epitome of harm reduction.
Sweden's constitution didn't allow them to mandate vaccines because their government is not allowed to murder its own citizens.
Everyone in authority agrees that vaccines will cause catastrophic brain swelling in a certain number of children each year and they will die.
Are you aware of the numbers? And are you aware of how unreliable and under-reported the database is?
What % of children are you willing to kill for what you believe is for the greater good? (ironically, the claim is to
save lives. How bout that Hippocratic Oath?)
Being anti-covid vaccine passports isn't "anti-vaxxer" no matter how much hyperbole you spew...
It actually is now because
they've changed the definition.
But the term "anti vaxxer" has always meant nothing and was used as a political silencing tool.
It's the equivalent of you not wanting poison in your food so you get labelled "anti food".
I know that anyone who uses the term unironically is r******d.
Thirdly, you've taken risks in life and survived. You've been lucky so far. But surely it's always better to minimise those risks where possible though?
You know what the risks are of experiencing any short, medium or long-term side effects from vaccines (or related mRNA-technology drugs) if you don't take them?
0%.
Do you think I should have a choice there or do you think I should be compelled to risk my life in order to maintain my employment?
The above has never ever been in dispute.
The short memory of people these days is what really boggles my noggin.
Walensky the Director of the CDC was on TV before the vaccine came out and she said "vaccinated people do not carry the virus, [they] don't get sick".
Fast forward some months and now she's on TV saying that the vaccines don't prevent transmission. That's a bit of a fucking flip.
It's all on video.
You all can't keep BSing for much longer.