• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Lysergamides LSD first timer. Questions and suggestions

What? Seriously are you trolling? I’m dead-ass. I’m trying to find any shred of evidence right now that the CNS sedative, Kava, somehow potentiates LSD. Do you have any data to back up your claim, b/c I’m not finding it. What in the actual fuck? I feel like I’m taking crazy pills with every statement you make.
Man, please- I’m not trolling.

For a start, I’m speaking from experience. For me, kava is very potentiating with LSD.

Your reasoning on the sedative, natural gaba benzo like nature of kava dulling the acid, it makes some sense, assumingly.

I was engaging on a kava forum for a while sticking to basics, discovering all best available cultivars, prep techniques etc.

One member is passionately invested in doing thorough scientific research into kava all round, newly emerging scientific discoveries of the medicinal properties of the Kavalactones, similar to cannabinoids but way lesser known.

He’s very experienced at fact checking, source finding and knows many kava researched kava enthusiasts.

I discussed this with him.

He did some digging. He told me….it appeared I may be onto something, something he came across to suggest there may be some receptor site binding affinity between the KL’s and acid.

Now Kava, is a pepper. Black pepper, or Pipperine, taken with cannabinoids, officially “slows down the degradation of the cannabinoids inside the receptors”.

I don’t know if that is related to receptor site binding affinity.

Just because something isn’t on Google, doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

It’s plausible to me to consider Kavalactones saturation could effect the way LSD works, lasts.
 
Ignore this lot, stick with psilocybin mushrooms.

When I was still capable of handling psychedelics, mushrooms won everytime. More intense, shorter duration and a greater healing effect.

A piece of paper with a fancy cartoon on proves nothing. At least with mushrooms you can judge the dose to a certain extent by the quantity.

With mushrooms you know what you're getting without running the risk of dodgy RCs on your blotter.

With mushrooms, even a difficult trip will leave you capable of functioning after 6 - 8 hours

Mushrooms give you a connection to the Earth and the Universe. For me, LSD was a bit too spacy and disconnected, gave a higher body load and a worse comedown.

I truly believe that synthetic psychedelics are inferior...
 
Wow, @unodelacosa you are certainly getting along well with others,
I am for the most part. I’m not gonna let somebody tell me a bunch of crap I know isn’t true, presented as facts with absolutely no evidence to back it up, and not have a response. If that bothers you, I would suggest developing some thicker skin, b/c people like to debate, especially on Internet forums. There are a LOT of other threads here though; I’m not in most of them. But I care about the truth, harm reduction, and spreading accurate information about drugs, not misleading garbagesauce coughed up with zero references. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I mean, for the record, it really does bother me that you feel this way. I like to think my contributions are helpful to some. If you read through my post history you might agree that I do know a little more than the average drug user on these topics, mostly owing to the fact that I spent years as an underground clandestine chemist. I’m not trying to reveal my identity even though I’m well passed the statute of limitations, but yeah, I’ve studied these topics in great depth.

and clearly have more experience than folks who’ve been tripping for 4 decades.
I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at here nor to whom you refer, but I also have decades of experience under my belt, plus the aforementioned chemistry knowledge and experience.
Come on, man.
No, no, you first, I insist.
Questioning others’ legitimacy and positing assertions about THEIR qualitative experiences is not acceptable, and that’s what you’re doing.
This is not what this is and anyway you’re not an authority to tell me what’s acceptable and what isn’t. The assertions being made are blanket statement opinions presented as fact. It is not simply someone’s qualitative experiences. It is not accurate nor reasonable to tell someone 25 µg of acid is all you need for a strong trip. It also is not accurate nor reasonable to tell someone acid lasts 24 hours. I mean, where are we gonna draw the line? I’m gonna posit that you only need THREE micrograms to trip SUPER HARD. And the smaller the dose, the longer the duration. There we go. Btw, don’t forget, the best way to take acid is by smoking it. That always wrecks my fucking world, smoking tabs of acid. I just lay them in a bong with some potentiating Kava and Kratom and then I use a torch lighter b/c the LSD has to get really, really hot to vaporize.

This is my qualitative experience, so don’t anyone tell me I’m wrong or making stuff up. (Before someone thinks I’m serious, I’m clearly exaggeratedly making this shit up to prove a point, @AutoTripper I’m looking in your direction since you never seem to catch my sarcasm).

See? That’s the logic you’re applying @DrumTripper. I’m trying to spread the truth and you’re defending people spreading misinformation.
Most of us here don’t like that behaviour and would love it if you stopped.
Oh you were delegated as the spokesperson for all Bluelighters? You get to make that statement that ”most of us here don’t like that behaviour”?

Since when have you been able to speak for everyone on this site? Something tells me you should just speak for yourself.
Your contributions to this thread have been argumentative and negative, although perfectly within BL’s guidelines.
Are we not allowed to debate? Am I not allowed to disagree when someone is dead wrong? What is the point then? If no one debated on here this forum would just be a giant drug circle jerk, and that’s fake as fuck and helps no one. Does debate stress you out or something?
For the record, LSD lasts 24 hours if you take enough.
Can you do me a big favor? I will apologize and eat humble pie right here on this forum, shame-faced and all, if you can reply with a link to a legit source confirming this statement, that LSD’s primary effect lasts 24 hours. I don’t buy afterglow bullshit. We all know no one goes by this.

And saying it lasts 8-12 hours is a statement of massive variability; fluctuating 50%.
And? My point is there is a cap to the duration. I’ve posted several sources of this knowledge, sources commonly and frequently cited on this very site in other threads. No one has shown me one scrap of evidence from a real, third-party source to back up their claims. I rest my case.

Different folks’ bodies notice it faster or slower on the comeup, and experience longer or shorter durations, depending on dozens of factors which are impossible to observe remotely.
Goddamn, I’m just wasting my time. Just never mind. The sad thing is: I think most of you know better. But what the fuck ever. I’m through arguing about this shit. Acid lasts 867 hours if you take enough. Everyone knows that.
 
Last edited:
Can you do me a big favor? I will apologize and eat humble pie right here on this forum, shame-faced and all, if you can reply with a link to a legit source confirming this statement, that LSD’s primary effect lasts 24 hours. I don’t buy afterglow bullshit. We all know no one goes by this.
Honest question pops in my mind, are we to assume John Lennon, Paul McCartney & Co were just talking shit about that?

No question they were taking genuine, legal, LSD 25, at 279 ug initially.
 
Are we not allowed to debate? Am I not allowed to disagree when someone is dead wrong? What is the point then? If no one debated on here this forum would just be a giant drug circle jerk, and that’s fake as fuck and helps no one. Does debate stress you out or something?
I welcome enlightenment, correction. Just again, with calm, civility, patience, certainly not hostility and ridicule.

Is that not a fair point?

I accepted the ecstasy ultimate definition thing. I’ve no shame admitting where I see I was wrong.

It’s inaccurate for you to see me as cowardly lacking face. I’m not like that.
 
He’s very experienced at fact checking, source finding and knows many kava researched kava enthusiasts.
This doesn’t count as you fact-checking anything since you need to present something like a link to another site, one established as some kind of reference authority on information like this.
I want one of those 24 hour acid tabs!! Be dancin like a MOTHERFUCKER'
Hahaha, I would question any acid that lasted that long as not being acid but rather a psychedelic amphetamine or something like Bromo-Dragonfly.

It’s interesting no one has any response for me when I pointed out the duration of LSD according to psychonautwiki.org is “8-12 hours”. Why aren’t you arguing with the site administrators over this if it’s not true?

@AutoTripper So you’re saying you like to take one whole milligram of LSD? Lol, okay… is this without any tolerance? Or is this after you’ve built tolerance? Be honest now…
 
I welcome enlightenment, correction. Just again, with calm, civility, patience, certainly not hostility and ridicule.

Is that not a fair point?

I accepted the ecstasy ultimate definition thing. I’ve no shame admitting where I see I was wrong.

It’s inaccurate for you to see me as cowardly lacking face. I’m not like that.
Don’t be so sensitive, and this isn’t for this thread. You’re getting personal now, and we can discuss that with private messages. And anyway I also conceded that it appears the British authorities call MDMA, MDA, MDE and MDDMA “ecstasy”. But that has nothing to do with this. Were you just dying to try to get one on me to even the score with this or something?

Again: post after post in this thread. No links or data sources presented. Anyone can make any claim they want, but it doesn’t make it true.
Honest question pops in my mind, are we to assume John Lennon, Paul McCartney & Co were just talking shit about that?
So that’s your attempt at showing data. Not even a link or anything but the very specific amount of 279 µg? Am I missing something here?

But no you’re right. A lot of science journal publications quote John, Paul, George and Ringo for their rigorous scientific studies. Thanks for pointing that out. It wasn’t useless information at all.
I welcome enlightenment, correction. Just again, with calm, civility, patience, certainly not hostility and ridicule
I think you think you do this. And also, when you were being petty and trying to suddenly correct some tiny grammar thing that had ZERO bearing on the discussion, are you really gonna claim that was not hostile ridicule? hmmm? People in glass houses…
 
This doesn’t count as you fact-checking anything since you need to present something like a link to another site, one established as some kind of reference authority on information like this.

Hahaha, I would question any acid that lasted that long as not being acid but rather a psychedelic amphetamine or something like Bromo-Dragonfly.

It’s interesting no one has any response for me when I pointed out the duration of LSD according to psychonautwiki.org is “8-12 hours”. Why aren’t you arguing with the site administrators over this if it’s not true?

@AutoTripper So you’re saying you like to take one whole milligram of LSD? Lol, okay… is this without any tolerance? Or is this after you’ve built tolerance? Be honest now…
I’ve done it without a tolerance. It’s not something to fear necessarily. It can be beautiful. The comeup is so instant it’s almost bypassed. It’s no major major big deal, no reason it can’t be a purely glorious experience.

And dose can be a bad time.

I’ve never had a bad trip on a 1000 ug dose.

You must know all of that anyway.
 
Were you just dying to try to get one on me to even the score with this or something?
No. Not at all. On that. You really, honestly mistake me at times I promise. I’ve not read more yet, just making this clear. I’m not into that.
 
No. Not at all. On that. You really, honestly mistake me at times I promise. I’ve not read more yet, just making this clear. I’m not into that.
Fine. Please address the following then: 1. how do you explain all these sources listing LSD’s duration as 8-12 hours then? 2. why are you not capable sharing a link to all of these supposed facts you’re giving us? SHOW US SOME EXTERNAL SOURCES OF DATA or else forfeit this hopelessly doomed argument. If you cannot provide a link to some third party data, you have nothing to stand on for these far-fetched claims. Simple as that. Hyperlink or bust.

EDIT: Res ipsa loquitur
 
Not even a link or anything but the very specific amount of 279 µg?
It was 1965. Legal, in liquid pods from British Chemists. Standardised at 279 ug then.

That’s how they first tripped. I listened to them, interviews, videos, what they took, where it came from, how they felt about it.

I know that was the exact dose in those legal pods at that time, just like OG microdots were typically 250 minimum, 300 strong, some higher even.

I’m not trying to provide a placard of stamped, signed proof.

And lol, I’ll hand you that, I’ve already joked about how I’m throwing stones from a glass house like few members here.
 
Fine. Please address the following then: 1. how do you explain all these sources listing LSD’s duration as 8-12 hours then? 2. why are you not capable sharing a link to all of these supposed facts you’re giving us? SHOW US SOME EXTERNAL SOURCES OF DATA or else forfeit this hopelessly doomed argument. If you cannot provide a link to some third party data, you have nothing to stand on for these far-fetched claims. Simple as that. Hyperlink or bust.

EDIT: Res ipsa loquitur
I’m sharing experience, I never said I had….facts, just to be fair.

I never realised this was to become so serious. I and others here share the experience of LSD lasting at much larger doses for longer than you are suggesting.

I’m not so weak minded (and that doesn’t mean close minded) to trust a public Wiki page and disregard my own longterm experience and that of many friends and relatives since 1996.
 
Get me some 24 hour acid tabs!! Be dancing like a MOTHERFUCKER in this heah!!
 
And don’t try to classify cannabis suddenly as a sedative, either, and even if it were, it wouldn’t change the fact that virtually anything slowing down the CNS will work counter to a psychedelics CNS stimulation properties.
I missed this. No way man, I won’t get caught red handed there and would passionately declare otherwise.

Sure, it has sleep affecting properties, CBD being the facilitator of deeper, true REM and THC helping get to sleep but inconducive ironically to proper restful deep sleep and always staying there.

But in my mind, always and forever, cannabis is a psychedelic/hallucinogen.
 
I missed this. No way man, I won’t get caught red handed there and would passionately declare otherwise.
Are you just going to ignore what I said about Kava and how it’s extremely unlikely to potentiate any psychedelic?

What about my request that you provide a link to a source for your claims?

Any response to me pointing out sources stating LSD lasts 8-12 hours? No comment or quoted source to prove me wrong???
Sure, it has sleep affecting properties, CBD being the facilitator of deeper, true REM
“True REM”? As opposed to fake REM? Also cannabis suppresses REM, which btw is NOT deep wave sleep, the actual, non-dreaming, reparative sleep that we truly seem to need. Check your facts, once again, because you’ve stated the opposite of what’s true. Once again. And I’m really not trying to pick on you but you keep responding to me with things that are factually FALSE.

“A 2008 study showed that the use of marijuana had a pronounced effect on sleep, with both smoked and orally consumed cannabis containing THC making it easier for the subject to fall asleep, increasing Stage 4 sleep, and reducing the time spent in REM sleep. (source: https://medicalalternativesclinics.com/2019/08/30/the-effects-of-marijuana-on-rem-sleep/)

Man I’m not trying to argue with you, but you just keep rolling out the wrong information. I mean, FFS, it takes a matter of seconds to search for this info on the Internet. I found at least a dozen or more links from reputable news sources quoting scientists, doctors, and researchers saying the opposite of what you stated here.

Doesn’t this bother you? Does it bother anyone else that you do this constantly? I swear, I’m just gonna stop responding to you b/c I suspect you’re trolling. If you weren’t you wouldn’t keep doing this and deliberately saying the opposite of what’s true. Why are you doing this??? I’m confused by your contradictory actions.
and THC helping get to sleep but inconducive ironically to proper restful deep sleep and always staying there.
Goddamn. Nope. The opposite is true, and there isn’t any irony to your statement even if it were correct in the first place… which it is not.

I’m not even kidding. PLEASE go look this topic up. I’m serious, I really, really would like it if you could just do this one thing. Either show me an article or something backing up your claim that THC is inconducive (I didn’t know this is a word; nice one) to restful sleep, or concede that you are pitifully bad at fact checking yourself and I would ask you to please resolve to be better about this in the future. Spreading misinformation is harmful to the public, especially when you spread it as often as you do in just about every other post you make.

Now don’t get butt-hurt at me for pointing this out. Someone has to do it.
But in my mind, always and forever, cannabis is a psychedelic/hallucinogen.
Well, I agree with you on this point. Finally.
 
Well, I agree with you on this point. Finally.
Hooray! I’m not being facetious or sarcastic, antagonistic.

THC does help you get to sleep. CBD is known to aid deep, restful, repairative sleep in at least a different way to THC.

I don’t ALWAYS like a stickler, use purely correct terms, but that’s not the same as using a term that conveys a substantial mismeaning.

So true REM, I hear you. True deep sleep, in the restful and repairative sense, is achieved more easily…I believe, with the help of CBD.

If that relates to REM or not, I can’t recall exactly.


I don’t have a source at present saying kavalactones potentiate psychedelics.

But kava alone is massively understudied, like decades behind cannabis but catching up well just recently.

Again, just because I haven’t an already conducted official study to link, does not make it fair insistence that it can’t possibly be the case.

My experience is what I go by with it. I know you will only be able to dismiss that of course and I can’t argue it.

Fact is, few few people report using large amounts of kava and acid together, but before I ever tried it I did scour a few accounts of people having a similar experience.

The kavalactones really influence neurotransmitters, the full range, so why again in the absence of the proof you request, should it be so inconceivable that it could effect the LSD?
 
THC does help you get to sleep.
And it suppresses most REM sleep, which you would know if you checked out the links I’ve shared on the subject or simply Google’d it (or DuckDuckGo or whatever) for yourself to be more educated on the topic, particularly once points have been made in this manner. I’m looking for cold, hard, real science.
CBD is known to aid deep, restful, repairative sleep in at least a different way to THC.
I just read on Wikipedia that much doubt has been cast on this assumption regarding CBD, actually. I didn’t know that either, though, tbf
I don’t ALWAYS like a stickler, use purely correct terms, but that’s not the same as using a term that conveys a substantial mismeaning.
Like what? Please tell me you’re not talking about the American English colloquialism “not hardly”. Everyone knows what that means, even if we’re to be pedantic enough to point out it is a double-negative. For that matter, I don’t say shit like, “Yes, that is I.” in response to someone calling my name and looking for me in a crowd of people. I would say “Yeah that’s me.” like most people, despite this technically being incorrect grammar by using the objective sense pronoun “me” instead of the subjective “I” since a being verb was used. The mode stays the same. I’m also fluent in Spanish but I tone down the accent at Mexican restaurants when I’m with non-Latin-Americans because it sounds pompous a bit, like the other examples. I realize you don’t have many Mexican restaurants in the U.K. and can only imagine what substitutions they make… conversely Indian food is not super common in the states, though they’re everywhere in the U.K.
So true REM, I hear you. True deep sleep, in the restful and repairative sense, is achieved more easily…I believe, with the help of CBD.
Why the inclusion of the word “true”. This implies a false REM which I’ve never heard of. Have you?

But again, it looks like maybe not regarding sleep and CBD. Seriously, hit up a search engine and you do some of the research for once. I’m tired of fetching articles no one appears to be reading.
If that relates to REM or not, I can’t recall exactly.
Well I do, and THC suppresses REM. Not the band, I mean the sleep, lol. Also, 5-HTP suppresses REM sleep. When you stop taking it after once a day for a week, you will have super vivid dreams due to a sort of build up effect after REM suppression. Some people use this as a launching point to lucid dreaming.
I don’t have a source at present saying kavalactones potentiate psychedelics.
Well then maybe you shouldn’t present it as if it were a confirmed fact. That spreads misinformation as people often do not fact check shit. Please don’t be a part of this problem. All you have to do is qualify it a bit with something like, “in my personal opinion“, or “in my own experiences” or something other than the way you stated it, as if it were common knowledge. What’d you say? “cannabinoids and Kavalactones both very potentiating with LSD” <— do you see what I’m saying? I don’t think I’m being unreasonable by pointing this out.
But kava alone is massively understudied, like decades behind cannabis but catching up well just recently.
All the more reason not to make a wild assumption like that.
Again, just because I haven’t an already conducted official study to link, does not make it fair insistence that it can’t possibly be the case.
I never said that I insisted it can’t possibly be the case. Now you’re putting words in my mouth. I asked for something to verify your claim, some “source at present” that you do not have. I’m willing to accept that it’s true if you have some evidence to point to outside of expecting everyone to accept your highly subjective personal experiences as across the board de facto always true for everyone.

I mean, you’re on medication and you have a serious ailment from Lyme Disease caught too late, you told me. It’s not unreasonable to conclude you might not be the best test subject for an average user of any particular drug. You have other variables that can call results into question. So that extra disqualifies you from stating your opinion disguised as a fact. You likely have unusual experiences and you said you haven’t rolled since 2005? Be aware that you have very strong, highly opinionated thoughts about a drug you’ve not taken in over 15 years. A lot can change in 15 years, both externally and internally to an individual and the world around them. My unsolicited $0.02 is to question your assumptions more closely and more often. Fact check things with search engines and other resources.
My experience is what I go by with it.
Yeah, I go by mine as well, but I temper it with outside knowledge and am aware of how biased subjective experience is. Meanwhile, the only thing you seem to go by is just your singular, one-person, FPS-style experience of the world without even so much as feigning interest in any of the sourced links I’ve posted. Thirst for the truth and for knowledge that comes from outside yourself to balance the knowledge you love building internally.
I know you will only be able to dismiss that of course and I can’t argue it.
No I’m not dismissing anecdotal experiences. Part of the reason I think 25 µg is an insignificant dose is because I’ve had that personal experience numerous times now. But that’s not sufficient alone. I then looked at reference material to see what the medical, biochem, and pharma industries think about a 25 µg dose. Yep, it’s active. Nope, no one says this is “strong”. You can attempt to claim you meant something different involving the word strong but I think you’re trying to save face. It’s not even a big deal; I truly believe you just misspoke without thinking critically about it first. I do this too from time to time.

I’ve also taken HUGE doses of LSD, including god knows how much I took in thumbprinting once with a group of hippie friends, including the LSD chemist who had made that batch. I’ve had pretty fully detached, in-and-out of deliriant states LSD trips where I was tripping so hard my whole ego was dissolved, I could not remember my name, age, or where I was born, I was completely gone in the aether. Once—this is embarrassing, but—I was at Burning Man and had taken a ten strip of some acid that turned out being much more than 100 µg/hit though I never found out how much exactly. But at some point during this trip, I don’t recall doing this, but I wedged my fist into my own mouth and after somewhere between 30 minutes and an hour I suddenly snapped to but was panicked and could not understand why I couldn’t speak. It took some really pretty, angel-winged chick to come over to me and calmly grab my wrist and remove it from my mouth. I was fucking mortified, and of course she was way too good looking for this to not maximize the embarrassment factor for yours truly. Then I still pretty much couldn’t carry on a conversation and was having a difficult time seeing more than 10 meters in front of me because of the fast moving, heavy visuals. I couldn’t make sense of things, and was very confused as to where I was, who I was, what anything in the world was, and it was fairly overwhelming and humbling in a very crushing kind of way I probably need at that time.

I’ve been through that, but still… no 24 hour trips on LSD. It’s always 12 hours for me unless I take one hit, in which case it might be more like 8 to 9 hours.

Fact is, few few people report using large amounts of kava and acid together, but before I ever tried it I did scour a few accounts of people having a similar experience.
[sigh…] Again, any evidence I can verify??? Conveniently for you, nope.
The kavalactones really influence neurotransmitters,
This is not in dispute, but it also doesn’t mean jackshit regarding it’s interaction with LSD.
the full range,
Define full range there, champ. Do you realize how many neurotransmitter subtypes exist in the human brain? And researchers are uncovering more year after year. Hell, LSD was discovered before 5-HT. And the 5-HT receptor subtypes have split and grown since then. I don’t believe any one drug hits every neurotransmitter. That seems hella illogical, but I will verify this later. (See how it works?)
so why again in the absence of the proof you request, should it be so inconceivable that it could effect the LSD?
Also I’m only pointing this out this one time to make this point, I usually let grammar slips go, because it’s very petty. So notice I’m not breaking your balls over using the wrong form of “effect” there. I make that mistake occasionally. It’s easy when you’re transcribing your thoughts. Does this make me think less of you or necessitate I act holier than thou? Not hardly 😝

Setting aside the fundamental problem you glazed over called “absence of proof”, it’s not inconceivable to me that Kava could potentiate LSD – again that’s putting words in my mouth. However, why do a strongly doubt this to be true? Again, b/c Kava acts as a sedative in the body. Everything else in the drug world that acts as a sedative has a counteractive effect on psychedelics, including LSD, which tend to have effects that ride hand-in-hand with anxiogenesis. Stopping the anxiogenesis appears to be tantamount to counteracting the psychedelic effects LSD produces. It doesn’t take a genius to figure this one out. It’s fairly intuitive, if you ask me.

Man it’s fucked up that you admit none of this is based on fact, but just arbitrary conjecture based on a trial group of one person. And you misrepresented my points by claiming I said it was “inconceivable” and “can’t possibly be the case”, which I never said. This is exactly what’s so frustrating to me. Then I get comments from the peanut gallery from this one and that one, but amazingly NOT A SINGLE ONE OF THEM had anything of evidence to point to.

What is the point of random, frequently uneducated conjecture? Doesn’t anyone else want to know things with certainty? I know I’m not the only one here who yearns for actual factual truth and not random brickwork guesses
 
^^

They dont prolong the good part of the trip tho do they burnout? From memory a big acid dose gets you really high for the same 6-8 hours but then you feel the shitty hangover bit for longer with a big dose.

Well larger doses also mean a longer, more intense peak, so if you're having a good trip and enjoying the intensity, then yes they do prolong the good part of the trip. Of course also, the come down from a higher dose is generally rougher than coming down from a lower dose.
 
Top