EuphoricNod -
As many have noted, this thread is chock full `o safe & sensible strategies for sucessfully scoring on the street. Props.
That said, it's also one of the most myopic threads I've ever encountered on BL, akin to the "can i snort percs?" threads and patently contrary to BL's stated mission of harm reduction.
I disagree w/ the posters who said this should be stickied. It should be closed.
Why? I'll let your own words (and subsequent actions) do the talking.
Delete if you will, but i'm going to tear you a new asshole here, fallacious statement by statement. From the top...
However I realize that many people g oto dangerous neighborhoods attempting to buy drugs and often times will get ripped off and sometimes mugged or beaten up.
You're right. Couldn't agree more. Scoring drugs in a dangerous area isn't exactly like taking a leisurely stroll to the friendly neighborhood starbucks.
But I'd always been under the (apparently mistaken) impression that BL was a bit
more than a forum dedicated to harm reduction. It was one of only a few boards where contributors could comfortably post about their real lives, including illegal activities. Kind of a bastion of free speech if you will. Drug laws are multi-billion $ racket. It's nice to be able to speak the truth. I'm a criminal too. And I value the freedom to say so. And I have no shame.
It appears that you've deleted quite a few posts; most of which deal with (again "seem", since as a recent interloper, i never had the opp. to read them) bringing a defensive weapon to a place where, once more to use your OWN words:
You must realize that copping on the streets is a DANGEROUS affair and some helpful pointers on how to assess the situation to which you are putting yourself into could drastically reduce your chances of getting hurt or killed.
Okay. I'd love to drastically reduce my chances of getting hurt or killed. Who wouldn't? Later posters opined that if the area was dangerous you shouldn't be going there in the first place. That's all fine & dandy. It would be great if pet hamsters lived forever and bublegum cured prostate cancer too. But scoring in (potentially) dangerous areas, for whatever reason, is what this thread was all about.
No?
So am I too understand that you advocate people (but only males!) put themselves in a situation where - no matter how attuned their situational awareness and how closely they follow common sense and employstreet smarts - there remains a very real chance that Mr. Murphy might step in and just about everything could go wrong?
And if that DOES happen, you further advise that the best recourse is to drop to your knees simpering and begging that they just take your money and please not to kick your ass. Or at least not too badly.
Pathetic.
...no one will look out for you but you.
<and>
The dealers will treat you well, but what about the other 95% of the population down there?
Agreed again. And again, allow me to emphasize that I've learned quite a bit here. This is a good thread but for the fact that it's been (GASP!) heavily censored. I bet you just HATE that word don't you? Someone as enlightened as yourself would NEVER stifle a dissident voice.
Now don't get the idea that I'm
advocating that anyone bring a weapon to a dangerous area. I'm not. What I am advocating is that a person has the CHOICE to do so, and if they're so inclined probably will do so. Just like they'll bang MsContin, no matter how many times they're admonished not to shoot pills.
Why not allow a disccussion? If the argument(s) are poor, let them fail on their on merit (or lack thereof)? Right? Trouble is, the arguments have merit.
If you can only defend your position via prompts to "check your pm...", your position is in all likelihood indefensible. So much so that you're not even willing to expose it to public scrutiny.
And defensive weapons don't have to be a gun or knife. How myopic... If you'd allowed the free exchange of ideas, someone just might have brought up the idea that guns, knives, chainsaws, et. al. probably AREN'T ideal for the precise reasons you pointed out.
But give someone a blunt object -- be it a ballpoint pen, a roll of dimes curled in the fist, hell, even a bic lighter -- and one CAN fuck up an aggressor in a bad way before they even see it coming. Contingent upon the situation and endless combination of variables, that very well might be a bad idea, or it might give you time a window in which to escape. Who knows? But at least you have the CHOICE. You're not anti-choice are you?
Additionally, most cops would be hard-pressed to tell the D.A. that they arrested some guy in the hood for possession of a magic marker.
Again, I'm NOT advocating bringing a weapon. Be it a Glock 19 loaded w/ +P hollowpoints or a flourescent sharpie... Rather, I'm advocating the discussion of such, because it's a reasonable, salient topic for this thread. Do you disagree? Pray tell why? And don't send me a pm.
Personally, I think you've overstated the potential for violence -- at least in my area (major east coast city). But why not have some insurance that COULD possibly get you out of a tight spot that you'd done everything possible to avoid?
Chances are you won't get in a head on collision w/ another driver tomorrow afternoon either, but you pay auto & medical insurance premiums don't you?
If a group of people calls you over to a REALLY secluded area and tells you to relax... they're prolly gonna try and jump you. Just ignore them. If they hassle you... LEAVE for a minute go a block over and try the people over there.
8( 8( 8(
I don't even know what to say about this. If "they're prolly gonna try and jump you... just ignore them."?
You seem like a reasonably bright guy -- are you this detached from reality?
So this hypothetical group of thugs are about to jump you... And you advise ignoring them? Or walking away? In short, as you take another kick to the side of the head, the best thing to do is nothing? Harm reduction... Christ. Your sappy ideology obviously comes first.
Why don't you just admit it? The thought of violence -- even in self-defense -- scares you to death. I don't know why. But I do know that you're an authoritarian. Left wing, but an authoritarian nonetheless. I doubt you have much of a problem with cops doing violence on your behalf -- especially when it's YOU they'd be saving.
Oh, and I just LOVE this one ya sexist pig!
and hayz I feel you if I were female you wouldnt be able to ppay me enugh to go out here and do it..
Maybe if she was armed, she'd feel more comfortable. Or maybe not. That's up to HER to decide, not you.
Believe it or not, there are still -- in this day and age! -- major metropolitan areas in the U.S. where concealed carry of a firearm is LEGAL. Last I checked, scoring on the street was ILLEGAL in EVERY metro area in the U.S.
Talk about a male/female equalizer; few are going to argue with a chick who has her gun pointed at their face... You really think all women are as spineless as you?
I'd wager that you hate being called "sexist" just as much as being dubbed an "authoritarian censor". But that's exactly what you are. And you hate it so much because it's true.
I could go on and on but I doubt this will make it past you as it cuts a little too close to home. But in the event that you're nodding off and it slips through, congratulations on tolerating ideas that differ from your own. That's a significant first step toward rational thought. You should be proud of yourself.