Mr Blonde
Bluelighter
^
Yes it also sounds bullshit to me as well. Particularly that the 10% who are prone to abuse will experience stimulation, and as many people have posted in this thread that's just not the case.
Meh, doctors and pharmacists can come out with a lot of bullshit sometimes. Reminds me of a thread a while ago where a pharmacist warned someone not to take codeine with an SSRI, since the 'depressant' action of codeine would overpower the SSRI and make him depressed. 8)
What kind of levels would such an occurrence have to reach before it's statistically significant? 10% seems significant to me, but I don't work in the field so I wouldn't know.
Yes it also sounds bullshit to me as well. Particularly that the 10% who are prone to abuse will experience stimulation, and as many people have posted in this thread that's just not the case.
Meh, doctors and pharmacists can come out with a lot of bullshit sometimes. Reminds me of a thread a while ago where a pharmacist warned someone not to take codeine with an SSRI, since the 'depressant' action of codeine would overpower the SSRI and make him depressed. 8)
In any drug/pharmaceutical text book (mainly thinking of mims here in Australia), both abuse and euphoria are listed as 'adverse reactions' and for this to occur, such reactions have to achieve statistical significance in clinical trials. In other words, 10% or below is not enough to achieve said significance and thus, would be considered rare.
What kind of levels would such an occurrence have to reach before it's statistically significant? 10% seems significant to me, but I don't work in the field so I wouldn't know.
