I remember reading something something somewhere@vash445 I'm not quite with you. Do you mean the 'new method' only has 0.5% impurities?
I have noted that if you go back a while, 'purple moonrock' averaging anywhere from 92% to 96% was flooding the market. I hope I explained what the impurities were and why they would be next to impossible to remove.
I looked at a few sites that 'test' drug samples but they still seem to use presumptive testing. Well, aromatic halogens won't change the results of those. I decided to see if I could find some GC-MS (halogens would increase MW of material) and NMR (halogens replace hydrogens so people would be missing). I note 2-chloro and 2-bromo MDMA were the most common impurities but it seems like all the combinations I mentioned do or at least did occur:
I note more recent samples look a lot cleaner. I mentioned the possibility of swapping a batch-process for a continuous-process and one of the key reasons why the latter has become so much more popular is that as long as the product is being continuously monitored, it's possible to adjust the process in tiny steps to 'home in' on the best result.
The thing to remember is that even if 'only' 92% of the product is actually MDMA, that product is going to produce the same effects as MDMA. From a 'filling the role' perspective, it's fine.
The latesnt thing I noted was that the price of moonrock MDMA has now dropped below $1/dose (in bulk). I know, I know, nobody specifies how much a dose IS. If it's 100mg then $10000/Kg? If it's 125mg then it's a mighty $12500/Kg.
Now what I find interesting is that it's just another example of a model only working on a HUGE scale.
About a decade ago I met two Dutch guys who had figured out how to produce a 'bilayer' pill i.e. one face could be one colour, the other face another colour. The theory was that with nobody else having such technology they could exclusivley produce very high quality tablets each with 125mg in them. At that time in the Dutch market, producers were regularly making pills with 250-300mg in each and still charge a low price. I think they figured that ther would be a market for people who would pay extra to know exactly how much of exactly what drug was in each pill...
But if moonrock is SO cheap, nobody is going to pay ten times as much.
Grisham's law ALWAYS acts on the drug market.
What they really need is a new product. Such things exist, but nobody has figured a way to make them cheap.
Although the oxirane intermediate used in that paper would allow for 3,4-methylenedioxy 4MAR (MDMAR).
They said F glycidate
Someone figured out BULK MDMA one pot from an unknown precourse it wasn't them. IDK if it was trustworthy...said they were super big or something and this competition pushed them out so to speak.
Maybe offered to join or whatever IDK how this works...
But.... I mean. Someone like you or me could like figure this out. But of course of I DIDN'T A WANT TO SAY .50 A GRAM BULK F GLYCIDATE until someone confirmed it.
The latest thing I noted was that the price of moonrock MDMA has now dropped below $1/dose (in bulk). I know, I know, nobody specifies how much a dose IS. If it's 100mg then $10000/Kg? If it's 125mg then it's a mighty $12500/Kg.
Hahahahaha I was told .50 a gram on a new method LIKE 4 YEARS AGO on Reddit or something
That is .50 CENTS United states dollar A GRAM BULK so doubling money is easy. ...
KINDA almost reminds of the of super D-lame OR WHATEVER going around...
I ALSO have noticed MUCH PURE moon rocks as well. Not perfect still flat.
But I could show 3 different ones right now. For market comparison
Last edited: