I think you misunderstood - and/or I didn't make it very clear - was meaning me being sycophantic with all the

for your pix. Hence balancing a bit with constructive criticism just to re-assert my status as actual trained photographer so I don't cry
That aside, it really is kinda hard to "teach" composition as - as noted - it ultimately comes down to personal taste. Would have to focus on individual shots and even then personal preference trumps "rules" every time. The Golden Rule ("thirds," Golden Section, etc) is the basis for all photographic composition (which you clearly already know as you mentioned it first) but knowing how and when to slightly break those rules is what seperates a great photograph from a good photograph imo.
Am probably too pissed to follow up on this tonight but will try to be more genuinely constructive in more sober state and when an obvious example comes to pass. Have been one or two you've posted that have caused minor wincing due to "so near, so far" status. Again, imo. It really is all down to personal taste at the end of the day. But one or two of your pix have come so close to being really, properly good (imo etc) that I was screaming to get in the darkroom and/or Photoshop to crop a bit.
I realise I am sounding like a total arse with much of this. But when the world and his dog has access to decent quality photography potential even on their phones it's basically just down to the niggling detail that makes the difference betwixt good and great. Do you use any software to fine tune and/or crop your pix at all? If not it really is worth trying to get a grip on cos it makes all the difference with digital photography. (Not that I'm anywhere near up to date with that stuff as far as new versions go 8))