Turkalurk said:
I'd rather jerk off for the rest of my life than to suck a dick.
Okay, but what if you got your dick sucked back? I cannot believe you would forgo such glory simply because of a preconception. Or if you did, I would be left feeling really sorry for you...
...and the thread just got too off-topic. :D
But, this ties in to the analogy some here have tried to draw; that of how a vegan would respond if the only thing available for sustenance was meat- on a desert island, this time witthout the cock, but with only a family of cows or death, most would choose to break up the happy family. If survival was dependant on it, I'd not believe the person who claims they would stick to their diet and therefore embrace death.
Is the need for sexual release a matter of survival?
Foreverafter said:
Here's another hypothetical:
What if "he's" a pre-op transsexual, with a beautiful feminine body and face.
Assuming he keeps his pants on, during the act, would you let him blow you?
You could just imagine he was female, in the same way you imagine (whatever it is that you do imagine) in the absence of pornography... I mean, what's the difference?
I could guess that reality is the difference. It does seem arbitrary when you put it like that. But I'm sure that there are people that have no same-sex attraction, though IME I've hardly met any. Again IME it seems that more people have
some same-sex attraction. There is a continuum; it seems rarely binary. Of course, as someone who has identified as bisexual (though I no longer really do...), its likely that I associate with like-minded people so my sample is automatically biased. In generations older then my own (I am 32) I see a lot more rigidity against the idea of sexual-continuum; I guess its confronting to grow up in a society of pure dualistic sexuality to suddenly acknowledge shades of grey. I've found that as I've aged my ability to be sexually attracted to men has declined, and I find myself more oriented to females, which disappoints me becuase I fucking loved having the desire and wherewithal to play around. I've noticed that the things that are really arousing to me are more 'simple' as I've aged, in that the idea and act of coming inside a woman, like really really deep, is possibly the most appealing thing (shocking I know

) (; It's like doing so is the realisation of all fantasies, put plain and simple, and anything else is almost like masturbation. Anyway, I still like the idea of sucking dick but haven't done so for about 4-5 years; and TBH I'm not sure I can see myself going back at anytime soon. Perhaps after I've had kids I will turn-on again.

Anyway, that ends my blog entry...
Back to the desert island thing. Are examples of extreme and unnatural circumstances, and how one would behave therein, really good ways to demonstrate a
natural aspect of human sexuality? Are we committing reductio ad absurdum here? Maybe you could ask yourself what other things you could supplant for desert island and other man, such as desert island and gorilla or desert island and child. The analogy makes the assumption that there is something uncontrollable in human sexuality (or male sexuality, at least) which I am personally cautious of accepting.