ForEverAfter
Ex-Bluelighter
What RM posted wasn't an absolutist approach any more than anybody having an opinion about anything can be described as absolutism... It wasn't absolutely anti-absolutist.
An absolute anti-absolutist (say that five times fast) stance wouldn't include a clause. An absolute anti-absolutist stance would be: It's not okay to be an absolutist, full stop... in which case the reaction might be warranted.
...
How's that for nit-picking?
It's okay to be an absolutist, but it's not okay to be an absolutist if...
An absolute anti-absolutist (say that five times fast) stance wouldn't include a clause. An absolute anti-absolutist stance would be: It's not okay to be an absolutist, full stop... in which case the reaction might be warranted.
...
How's that for nit-picking?
Last edited: