I don't see how you could hand somebody a carte blanche for their uninformed artistic opinions, when if somebody held positions as uninformed in other spheres on bluelight (say, someone in CE&P who clings to the belief that Saddam had WMDs and was aiding Bin Laden) you would probably agree with the people who kindly offered factual links of contrary information.
Why are some opinions off limits to rational and logical challenge?
it's art we're discussing - is it really that hard to believe that different people have different preferences and those preferences vary in strength?
DigitalDuality said:Gottfried Helnwein
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
it bugs me that's not actually symmetrical... maybe that's the point?Sn2.ru said:![]()
Edward Ruscha: Sex at Noon Taxes