i'm not going to get dragged into a debate in this troll forum, but i'm just going to interject one more thing. if you honestly advocate violence and destruction of property as a reasonable means of achieving social justice then you're out of your mind. there are legitimate avenues for reforming the system if it is broken, and they are effective when used correctly. this was proven by the civil rights movement of the 60's, which made an enormous amount of progress for oppressed minority groups and was largely nonviolent. yes, there are still problems, some big ones, but they need to be addressed through legitimate avenues in a systematic way.
exactly. a grand jury, which is about as impartial an entity as is possible for human beings to construct, and acts as autonomously from any type of outside influence as is possible for humans to act, examined the evidence extensively and considered the testimony of over 60 witnesses and determined that there was not probable cause to charge the police officer with a crime in this case. the police officer was attacked and was defending himself, he did not commit murder or any other crime, and was acting within the boundaries of the law. the decision of the grand jury not to charge him was sound from a legal standpoint.