• Psychedelic Drugs Welcome Guest
    View threads about
    Posting RulesBluelight Rules
    PD's Best Threads Index
    Social ThreadSupport Bluelight
    Psychedelic Beginner's FAQ
  • PD Moderators: Esperighanto | JackARoe | Cheshire_Kat

Phenethylamines The Big & Dandy 2C-T-7 Thread

I think 2C-T-7 is a wonderful name for a drug. Infact, I think Shulgin did an absolutely brilliant job of coming up with a...what's it called..taxonomic nomenclature this-or-that something or other. But yeah, don't dis the 2C's, don't dis the 2C-T's, becuase if you are, you're basically dissing shulgin, and he's way cooler than you, and if you don't like it then don't do drugs, simple as that.
 
I would advise against taking this drug rectally. Doing so requires one to be incredibly judicious and precise with one's dosing (T-7 seems as bioavailable rectally as it does nasally, and we've all read the stories of those unlucky few who died from putting this one up their honkers) and IME produces a short but incredibly violent come-up, which inevitably culminates in projectile vomiting.
There's NO way rectal BA = insufflated. I have plenty of experience with both ROAs, and insufflated is more potent.

^ Ya man. I took 38mg of T-7 and didn't yack. IME plugging produces more nausea than oral dosing. Not everyone's experience I know, but to some plugging is not all it's cracked up to be on here.
Rectal t-7 is a waste IMO/IME.
2C-T-7 is a really shit name for a drug, isn't it. Blue mystic is even fucking dumber. Let's think of a better one.
Perhaps 2,5-dimethoxy-4-thiopropyl-phenethylamine works better? Or maybe it really doesn't matter what you call it...
 
I say whoever creates the chemical gets to name it. Shulgin created 2C-T-7, he named it 2C-T-7, let us respect that, ok?
 
Guys, take it easy. My statement was tongue-in-cheek. I understand that tone is often difficult to detect over the internet and that it wasn't really funny anyway, but frankly I'm surprised that people are actually getting offended over my statement. I thought PD was a little better natured than that.

My educational background is in biochemistry. I completely understand why 2C-T-7 is named what it is. I also understand that pet names for drugs are not only stupid and unnecessary, but often dangerous as well. Again, my post was not serious. I was tripping on the stuff and in my intoxicated state of mind it struck me that 2C-T-7 is an especially ugly name, even compared to the other 2Cs. To me it sounds harsh and uninviting (which is probably a good thing anyway, but I digress). So I thought it would be fun to see what other PD regulars would come up with if they had to opportunity to rename 2C-T-7. I wasn't seriously suggesting that we should rename the compound (as if that would even be remotely possible anyway). I think that part at least should have been obvious.

Shambles: You are well respected in my eyes. I know that this is your forum, and it is completely your call how you moderate it. If you want to edit out the following and take it to PM, I'll respect that too. I'm just posting this in public to hopefully clear up any possible confusion.

In retrospect, my most recent reply to Chemical Wizard was probably a bit over the line. My response was a hurtful thing to say. I was just angry because of this:

But yeah, don't dis the 2C's, don't dis the 2C-T's, becuase if you are, you're basically dissing shulgin, and he's way cooler than you, and if you don't like it then don't do drugs, simple as that.

At the time it seemed a rather obnoxious and presumptuous thing to say. It's a pet peeve of mine when people give their opinion as if it is fact and then follow it with "simple as that" (even though I am often guilty of this offense myself). Things in life are rarely "as simple as that" -- well, if you're a thoughtful person anyway. I mean, honestly, if I don't like the name of a particular compound then my only option is to abstain from drugs? If I don't like a particular compound [even though I do, and I don't believe I ever said otherwise] than that somehow means I'm "dissing" Shulgin? A very haughty remark. But alas, I'm probably overreacting in my sleep deprived state, so let's forget about it. So in conclusion, I agree that that my response to CW was unnecessary and basically an emotional personal attack.

I have a slight issue with deleting my posts that were in response to Dread. Even taking the ambiguity of online posting into account, I'm quite surprised that those posts could be interpreted as flaming. Nonetheless, they were also a bit off-topic and thus unnecessary, and if you really feel that they should be deleted then I completely understand. What I do have a bigger problem with is the fact that those posts were deleted while something like this:

Your post is pure garbage and you are an ignorant and hypocritical fool. Pepcid AC works for ALL research chems, dumbass.

is allowed to remain.

Anyway, thanks if you actually read all of that and thanks for your consideration :).
 
Last edited:
Alritght Trancendence, I apologize for making intense remarks. I did have a bit of a snarky tone with that post, I will admit, but is 2C-T-7 really that bad of a name ?

I like to think of PiHKAL and TiHKAL as spell books, and Shulgin as Merlin. All the chemical names are like spell names, all the recipes for making these drugs are like esoteric instructons that only "specially trained" chemists/magicians understand. The chemical names and abbreviates names of these drugs are actually magical. Most of the common population doesn't know what 2C-T-7 means, and I think that is pretty cool.

The Shulgin/Merlin comparison is from Breaking open the Head. That is a sweet book, I recommend it if you have not read it. Now lets be nice. Sorry for all that everyone.
 
I have a slight issue with deleting my posts that were in response to Dread. Even taking the ambiguity of online posting into account, I'm quite surprised that those posts could be interpreted as flaming. Nonetheless, they were also a bit off-topic and thus unnecessary, and if you really feel that they should be deleted then I completely understand.

The emboldened part was the main reason for deletion and the only reason the "dumbass" comment escaped the snipping scissors was because that poster had been memberated into submission already. I quite possibly should have just removed all of that whole argument but that's often quite fiddly and disrupts the flow of conversation so I just removed the posts that I didn't think would be missed.

If a member has an issue with with what another member has posted then it's best to report it if it breaks the rules (flaming and personal attacks, for example) or take it to PM to either sort your differences or put them on "Ignore". I wasn't singling your posts out as being any worse than any others but that whole thing was pretty unnecessary and doesn't help others who read this thread to garner information.

Good to see apologies are being made now. It really can be hard to discern tone from words on a screen so misunderstandings are easy. They're just a bit of a chore for others to have to wade through is all ;)
 
Yeah, it's good to make peace. Trancendence, I think of you as no less of a Bluelighter, infact, I appreciate your straightforwardness and I think that more people in this world need to be more open about how they feel, even if it results in arguing. As long as we can argue like civil people.

I was also in a bit of manic state last night. Re-reading your post, I can detect humor in what you are saying now. I also have a bit of sarcastic wit, and I think I just got carried away. I know you weren't dissing Shulgin.
 
Yes, everything always seems a bit clearer in the light of day. :D I think the problem was that similar personalities often unintentionally conflict with another.
 
funny, 2C-T-7 is the next thing on my to do list....after I get all these other things out of my system. 2C-T-7 is something i never feel like mixing with other stuff....it's jsut got too much going on. I'm not that familiar with it either though....I would mix it with ketamine and nitrous for sure, but other psychedelics.....i dunno, it's a pretty rich experience by itself.
 
I have just got a 54mg sample of this stuff. would it be best shared between 2 or 3 ppl???

I havent tried this before but have done T2 and 2CC a few times
 
Unless you're snorting it stick to two. Even then the experience might not be all that intense for you.
 
I'd say from a tolerance point of view it would be better to take the 2C one day and then LSD the next day.

LSD has such a strong affinity for the 5HT2a receptor that it'll bind to nearly anything that didn't get down-regulated.
 
Top