100 was the first timeDo you perhaps have buils up some tolerance?
200 2 week later
300 1 month later
100 was the first timeDo you perhaps have buils up some tolerance?
Any other history of psychedelic drug use (or antidepressants, neuroleptics, amphetamines, sleeping aids, pain medication, you name it)?100 was the first time
200 2 week later
300 1 month later
No medication at all.Any other history of psychedelic drug use (or antidepressants, neuroleptics, amphetamines, sleeping aids, pain medication, you name it)?
If not, you are probably born hard-head (I myself have similar tendencies).
And, to get completely indiscreet: age of first psychedelic experience and age now... (please tell us, for science's sake!) 8)
Hardhead probably a bit but I think I not the only one to feel that 1p seems less potent than lsd. However it's difficult to compare because it's impossible to know how much lsd I have on a lsd tab but the general consensus is that there is between 70µ and 100µ on street tabs.Based on the information that you've shared recently, I reckon that you're a bit of a hardhead.
Regarding the piracetam and centrophenoxine that you take as "food supplements", are you using them as nootropics, or to treat a dementia-related condition?
Your use of NADH sounds intriguing, btw.
Fair enough but in the experience you describe, users experienced different effects but I don't think they had all the same effect from the red pill. With 1p there is consensus on several concordant effect.
Might be auto suggestion but I don't buy it.
Might be that the timing creates different effect.
Might be a prodrug of something else than lsd.
Or might be active on its own.
Anyway for me 1p has definitely a different flavor than lsd corroborated by others experience.
People did experience consistant effects from the colored LSD -- for example, they thought one type was more "speedy" than the others.
The fact that people here are experiencing consistant effects from 1P-LSD ends up being meaningless, because all the people who are having similar experiences are frequenting the same boards and reading each others descriptions. Reading a description of the effects will forever color your subsequent experiences, and it predisposes you to have a similar experience. The only way to make an unbiased comparison is to use blind dosing.
Under blind dosing conditions, people experienced with LSD can't effectively differentiate between psilocybin, LSD, and mescaline. They fail utterly. And those people had been given doses of pure Sandoz LSD on numerous occasions over a period of years. If people can't actually tell the difference between LSD and mescaline then do you honestly think you have any hope of differentiating between LSD and 1P-LSD?
I'm aware that many people think that they can make these distinctions, but there is no way for a person to know whether they can or not until they try, under blind conditions.
It's not difficult for me to believe that knowing it's 1p-LSD might be causing people to experience it differently over regular LSD, but I think anyone with a lot of experience with different psychedelics would be able to tell the difference between mushrooms and LSD. They don't feel the same at all, the come-up is totally different, the visuals are different, and the headspace is dramatically different.
But 1P-LSD is a world of difference from mushrooms.
-come up 20-45 minutes
-always have nausea
-feel sedate the whole trip
-can't eat or drink until I'm coming back down
1P-LSD
-come up 30ish-90ish minutes
-very little nausea, but gas
-sedate during the come up, wired otherwise
-can eat and drink normally the entire length of the trip
They just feel different
Tom
First, these comparisons are done in a way so that the time-course doesn't influence differentiation. Of course, you could distinguish a drug that lasts 4 hours from one that lasts 8-10. That doesn't mean that you can tell the difference between their effects.
Second, mushrooms are not the same thing as psilocybin. Mushrooms are not exactly pleasant things to eat and they can produce nausea independent of the effect of psilocybin. The nausea has nothing to do with the hallucinogenic effects. You can't effectively do this type of comparison with mushrooms, it has to be pure psilocybin. What you are claiming is effectively like saying that the ethanol in vodka and wine is different because wine always gives you a headache and vodka doesn't.
Third, the fact that you are ingesting a hallucinogen in the form of a natural product (mushrooms) is going to markedly color your experience. People often report seeing mushroom-specific visual hallucinations.
Yes, the idea of a very experienced psychonaut not being able to distinguish between LSD, psilocybin/psilocin and mescaline is completely absurd to me. And those are just the big three... I can easily tell the difference between *many* psychedelics -- and name them, too.