It's a shame they couldn't be clearer on the 'purchase intent' details, all it says is 'Legal LSD analogue' and there is no mention that what they had was sold to them as PARGY-LAD. It's also a shame no photograph was included in the report. A photograph and confirmation that the sample was supposed to be PARGY-LAD would have been better proof. Does anyone know who it was that sent in the sample? I'm just wanting to be certain that this really was one of the alleged PARGY-LAD blotters, and that it was purchased from that particular batch. Until we have that confirmation I'm unsure what to make of this. It will be really disappointing if it turns out to be just a combination of AL-LAD & LSZ.
Is it possible that this blotter was purchased somewhere else, maybe even from a street dealer? As we're all eager to get information on PARGY-LAD, I don't understand why someone would send it in for testing without quoting that they believed it was PARGY-LAD. Just quoting that it was a 'Legal LSD Analogue' doesn't prove that this was one of the alleged PARGY-LAD blotters. If they just purchased it as a 'Legal LSD Analogue' and then it was found to contain both AL-LAD and LSZ, then to me it sounds like they got what they thought they were getting, as both AL-LAD and LSZ are legal LSD analogues. Nowhere in the report does it say that the purchase intent was PARGY-LAD, I think that's the key thing here.