Ahem.. did I call it or did I call it? (JK I think that was just one of many speculations I spewed...)
Sigh... disappointed. Oh well, eth or pro-lad seem more promising anyways, I hope those get synthed.
You nailed it man, no question!
Ahem.. did I call it or did I call it? (JK I think that was just one of many speculations I spewed...)
Sigh... disappointed. Oh well, eth or pro-lad seem more promising anyways, I hope those get synthed.
It's a shame they couldn't be clearer on the 'purchase intent' details, all it says is 'Legal LSD analogue' and there is no mention that what they had was sold to them as PARGY-LAD. It's also a shame no photograph was included in the report. A photograph and confirmation that the sample was supposed to be PARGY-LAD would have been better proof. Does anyone know who it was that sent in the sample? I'm just wanting to be certain that this really was one of the alleged PARGY-LAD blotters, and that it was purchased from that particular batch. Until we have that confirmation I'm unsure what to make of this. It will be really disappointing if it turns out to be just a combination of AL-LAD & LSZ.
Is it possible that this blotter was purchased somewhere else, maybe even from a street dealer? As we're all eager to get information on PARGY-LAD, I don't understand why someone would send it in for testing without quoting that they believed it was PARGY-LAD. Just quoting that it was a 'Legal LSD Analogue' doesn't prove that this was one of the alleged PARGY-LAD blotters. If they just purchased it as a 'Legal LSD Analogue' and then it was found to contain both AL-LAD and LSZ, then to me it sounds like they got what they thought they were getting, as both AL-LAD and LSZ are legal LSD analogues. Nowhere in the report does it say that the purchase intent was PARGY-LAD, I think that's the key thing here.
That's a shame. Hopefully others who purchased it can send in for analysis to compare results. While I doubt the person who sent in their sample had an agenda in mind, it's hard to call one test definitive.
I have no idea why the wedinos report it so vague but I am absolutely certain that the vendor in question is the one that supplied the tabs tested. Pargy-Lad just ain't Pargy Lad. If it was Pargy-Lad, it was hidden in amongst Al-Lad & LSz & there wouldn't be an awful lot of point in that.
Very dissapointing, & I didn't even get any!
This whole story is all too fucked up. Who can be so stupid to offer some new lysergamide (or anything) without even testing it?! I wouldn't imagine that... Even if someday it is proven that he has PARGY-LAD, he's still an idiot, because he is selling it without even knowing it for sure!
In that infamous other forum, a guy said the vendor is telling costumers that they have to prove it if they think he doesn't really have it! What a douche...
Si Ingwe, Ive been watching a pargy lad thread on another forum and I dont know what to think anymore. Did Wedinos find two seperate molecules or do you think that some of their analysis was based on speculation.
IF Pargy-Lad had existed on those tabs, Wedinos may not have had a control to compare it to, because Pargy-Lad has not already circulated & been proven to exist on the market. I am guessing that this is how Wedinos works but if anyone knows for sure, please chime in.
is it really such a stretch that an obscure new drug appearing on the market might actually just be a rebranded form of a less obscure drug?