Itsgoneundertheboa
Bluelighter
Thanks for the info on the apples. The ones I have look more like this (from a photo I was sent) - https://www.ecstasydata.org/view.php?id=3172 but seeing as im not in America I find it hard to believe they are the same pill.
They also look quite like these pills in terms of colour and texture - https://www.ecstasydata.org/view.php?id=2555
I havnt got a chance to test them yet as a friend is holding them for me but I might get a chance later today. The source said they have been enjoying the same press now for months and everyone is loving them and I really do trust their word but im still skeptical just with the reputation of green apples.
Your right to be. You can buy and have been able to buy cheap pill dyes for ages on apples so likely your looking at a home press. See the video I posted a little bit back if you want to see how it's done.
To be honest mate any pills that don't show up as a large scale press operation should be tested with caution no matter what the fella selling you it tries to say (he ain't selling it for your benefit). If you take a look at the pill you can generally tell. Enteric coating is a dead give away - only used on high grade pressing and usually to ensure stability of transport etc. Small scales never have that shiny coating.
Personally if I don't see good results by my own eyes reagent and user report I steer clear. I only do pills I can identify myself.
I also study closely the weights and dimensions of reported pills. It's very difficult to get the exact weight of copying due to specific gravity of the binder being used. IE all fillers have a given density. If their is a variance of the filler / binder used or more less MD % this will generally alert on a test report as a differing weight. Wish we would all learn to weight our pills as you could very quickly build up a picture of what pills are copies, second runs etc.