• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Official Paedo Discussion Megathread v2

Shambles said:
Patrick Moore was a rather romantic ol' sausage really. The love of his life died during the war and he never looked at another woman apparently. Either very sweet or a bit sad depending on how you look at it really.
Click to expand...

oh yes i know this, and i'm sure he was the wrong example to pick. the point being that there are prob peeps with paedo tendencies who plunge themselves into other things to avoid their paedo tendencies in the same way that i as a child plunged myself into my education to avoid the sadness and emptiness of not having a mother...then plunging myself (pun) into heroin addiction for the same reason, but also to avoid sexual urges in a way since i didn't want my boy having many uncles nor myself having let downs.
 
I'm sure that must be true, Pink. Cold showers and all that. Or heroin. Definitely heroin. Turned my ex-fiance from - frankly - an unbelievable slut (I mean that affectionately <3) to a Xmas and B'days if yer lucky kinda gal. Which suited me fine as I'd been on the scag quite a bit longer than she had. Diamorphine prescriptions for paedos? Now that is an idea that could work...
 
Read it and weep...

Jimmy Savile scandal: Report reveals extent of abuse

Savile offended at 13 hospitals, including Great Ormond Street, and one offence was recorded at Wheatfields Hospice in 1977

His youngest victim was an eight-year-old boy, and the oldest was 47

The earliest allegation is from 1955 in Manchester and the last from 2009

Offences were carried out at the BBC between 1965 and 2006, including at the last Top of the Pops recording

Peak offending took place between 1966 and 1976

Some 73% of victims were under 18. Most were aged 13 to 16

There is "no clear evidence" he operated in paedophile ring, although "whether he was part of an informal network" is still being investigated
Click to expand...
 
So I guess he was the sort to be in it for the power trip not because he is specifically sexually attracted to children? Unless he was sexually attracted to everyone regardless of age/sex.. omnisexual, like God Almighty.
 
Given the kindsa people he... did things with I'm guessing more of a power trip kinda deal too, Ms Eff. Definitely not what you'd think of as sex in any standard sense of the word anyway. You definitely get the impression he's a control freak with an ego the size of a planet when you see him interviewed - especially in that Louis Theroux interview when he was straight up asked if he was a paedo... and didn't deny it. Tbh, the clues were rather out in the open :\
 
Aye. He definitely came over as an uberfreak - the bizniz with spending the night with his dead mother was a pretty big warning sign of freakery - but even when he more or less said he was a nonce I still thought he was just a weirdo who thought he was being all wise and mysterious or summat. I suppose it's not the type of thing you expect anyone to just come out and say - especially on camera - and mean it. But I suppose in a way he really was the master puppeteer kinda chap he thought of himself as cos he did get away with it til the very end despite more or less rubbing our noses in it the whole time. From his perspective he "won".
 
That fat cunt Cyril Smith,Jesus fucking christ,if he ever went 'on top' there would be no remaining evidence left.

If it were'nt for Saville croaking it,would these other allegations arise. They may as well do a paedo lottery for who's next. It's a living fucking nightmare.
 
pontifex01 said:
I think an important distinction to be made is that between a paedophile (namely, one who is sexually attracted to children) and a child molester. The latter implies the former but the reverse isn't (necessarily) true.
Click to expand...
Indeed, there is a world of difference between thoughts and actions. The inside of a person's head is a private place, probably the most private place there is.

We probably will never know how many people harbour thoughts that they never turn into actions, because they sure as hell aren't going to talk about it in the present climate. But frankly, if some sicko is going to get his filthy little rocks off, I'd much sooner he did so into a box of tissues than anywhere near a real, live child.

As for the word thing, I think the damage has been done now by the tabloid press, and the word "pædophile" has now come always to mean "child molester". It probably would be easier to get a new word for a non-child-molesting pædophile than to try to reclaim it now.
 
parttime crackhead said:
He near enough admits it in that Louis Theroux one. You can tell that he's getting a kick out of just about saying "I am a fucking paedo, what you gonna do about it? Fuck all".
Click to expand...


and what you said before. it is very clear that "sir jim" so-vile was clearly a very horrible man. a very horrible and nasty little man. adults who have a clue about the world and are wise enough to steer clear of cunts would have steared well clear of savile. there were very few friends. he's always referred to as a recluse- horrible cunt. It is quite clear he would not be able to get his dick wet with any grown woman because he was a nasty creepy bastard. He seems to feel that he had a right to sex even though he was a horrible man. If he was such the good catholic he would have stayed celibate when he couldn't get a woman coz he's horrible.

He was helped along by other horrible bastards though, that's clear.
 
i saw a tabloid in the shops the other day with jim davidsons face and the headline 'I'M NO SAVILLE claims davidson'
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top