You can't understand what I am saying- that is, sure there is a maximum speed that light can travel, but you cannot tell me why that is so.
You said in an earlier post that your question was "not why, but who".
Not why, but who? Who determined it- or is it just as it is? Because, in your own proclaimed complexity, shouldn't you know that? Thats my problem with the universe; we have rather definite laws regarding the nature of nature- but no idea as to any "law" which governs these laws. I just find it funny that your not looking even further beyond yourself- you've admitted the speed of light is the maximum "allowed" speeed, a trait presumedly given unto light by its Creator- what I want to know is who is it? Who allowed this? And, by something being allowed, certainly does not rule out the notion of rules being broken.
Can you please clarify your contradiction for me please? Or was that paragraph of yours just rambling.
Oh. My. Lord. You are going to realise very soon, child, how inconceivably little intelligence you are showing. An inteligent person has doubts, test theories- does not exhibit a certainty about things no-one in the universe is certain of- thats called being blinded.
Heed your own advice
Anyway, this debate just became unpleasant. If your the thumb of god, I'd suggest it be reinserted into His anus abruptly.
I will reinsert it into his anus, considering it seems that his anus is in fact your mouth.
Unless you are too complex to exhibit kindness or some sort of self-restraint, then I feel the next stage of spunky human evolution is kinda piss poor
Let me produce an appropriate inverse response, hmm.... "No, you're wrong! My dick is much bigger than yours!"
Perhaps you could reply again sometime, and we can degrade from profanity to simply barking at each other.
of which you have kindly presented us your own interpretations
I just simplified the theories into a few statements to save some time for those who chose to read that post.
If you see flaws in the simplification, please point them out.
Okay, thanks for the explanation of Einstein's theory. But how is it that this explains that there is nothing more complex in the universe than us?
Since the only certain value you perceive is yourself, then you place a value on yourself that is higher than all other values.
I would like to do a study to prove statistically what shall hitherto be known as h.a.'s law
h.a.'s law: individual (20 +/- 2yrs) age + use of psychedelic or dissociative drugs = grandiosity centering on some half-baked, semi-coherent understanding of post-Einsteinian physics.
I swear if I had a penny for every thread fitting this equation I've read on drug related forums, I'd have a good few dollars in my pocket. At least enough to get a dose of something to make those theories seem much more convincing.
Oh dear, how humiliated the individual must feel who is being referenced in this equation of yours!
Perhaps this individual would hold better odds of winning the popularity vote for his proclamations of grandiosity if he had incorporated ridiculous liberal ideals, a
pro-legalization of illicit drugs speech, and an arsenal of insults directed at the non-specific party of "stupid rednecks" into his strategy. Or to increase his disposition with the authority around him, he could have dropped to his knees and commenced a social dicksucking of the noble kings/queens around him (in the event of the stage being an online forum, maybe these nobles included some forum moderators or users with high post counts). Yes, if this individual had done all that, he perhaps would have won over his audience.
Instead the audience decided it would be much more exciting to socially gang-bang the individual in an orgy of narcissism.
If the audience could generate enough insults (measured as IPP - Insults Per Post - in the case of an online forum) then this would by some irrational means negate the need for them respond to the individual's referenced evidence (which still seems to be irrefutable until someone kindly disproves it), and instead just start screaming profanity and snuffing those who disagree with them. Maybe the audience could even bring up what the individual has done in the past as evidence that would somehow falsify the completely non-related physics which were originally the matter of discussion. Now the audience can delightfully take a shit in peace, while simultaneously orgasming from the increase in their now-massive ego.
Am I too late to jump into the circle jerk?
Maybe the individual forgot to account for the age of the audience, which affects the validity of the audience's opinions due to a higher age.
Law of Age in Opinion Validity:
Opinion of dickwad A is
always true if the age of dickwad A > age of cuntbag B
^What about if the universe is contracting, and time is running backwards, hence we remeber the past and it would still appear that we are in an expanding universe? Time could be running backwards, but we wouldn't neccesarily know.
Then again, the whole concept of entropy kinda determines that we are moving forward in time, unless things decay before they take full form.
Nice post Xorkoth
That the universe is not curved? Care to link to that- sounds intriguing.
Nice use of "kinda sorta could be" retarded physics that not only imply that you have
no idea what the hell you are talking about, but you are talking about an idea that failed to make sense in your own mind because of your lack of understanding in the field of study you are trying to mimick an understanding of, then in the next paragraph you understood how stupid the first paragraph was:
What if up is actually down, and gravity is running backwards, hence we fall up into the sky. Gravity could be running backwards, but we wouldn't necessarily know.
Then again, the whole concept of heaviness kinda determines that we are falling down towards the ground, unless my thoughts decay before they make sensible form.
OH I SEE WHAT U DID THER
Nice post Xorkoth
Congratulations, your social disposition with Xorkoth has increased by +1 !!!!
Notice how he adds the smiley face, as if Xorkoth wouldn't notice that swilow is trying to kiss his ass!
Your serious attempt of trying to gain a sense of self-significance by posing as a "
bad ass" on an online forum is comical!
That the universe is not curved? Care to link to that- sounds intriguing.
I'm sure you will completely misinterpret this, as you do with all other information that previously made sense, but here it is anyways:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedmann_equations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_Universe
Serious question - do you have a learning disability? If not - how old are you?
As I said above, I really have no idea what I'm talking about
Ok, ok, its good to know that you are atleast aware of this.
![:\](https://bluelight.org/xf/BL_Images/Orig_Emoji/wrygrin.gif "wry grin :\")
.
