What about a behavior that is self-deprecating?
I see what you are saying. And, yes, in one sense it is true. But it is completely extreme interpretation of a truth. If you truly believe in what you say, then someone will institutionalize you IRL. And they will do so to protect you from yourself. Such beliefs are not the product of a healthy mind.
Indeed it is a quite radical interpretation of the truth. The scary conclusion is however, that it is the interpretation all of us have made about ourselves subconsciously. It lies far beyond the human ego. Can we harvest this out? Can we apply this knowledge to our ego? Can we make ourselves aware of our own sense of superiority over all others?
"I sold my soul to Satan"
Did you ever have any luck?
The harsh conclusion for a truth-seeking mind is: The more complex our moral intelligence becomes, the harder it becomes to stay emotionally content. Radical emotions bring radical conclusions. Wise men have to learn to keep emotions out of the equations one way or another.
If you have evidence to support your claims, please present it.
I have dozens of different writings that I've worked on trying to pin-point my philosophy, and they vary quite a bit. If you would like a more/less technical writing just ask, but I will give you one of them that would seem to me to be a good summary of my evidence. Most of the mathematical questions can be answered with a quick search on whatever subject I might be talking about. Without bombing this thread with technical equations, I will give a much more philisophical and less mathematical writing that I made a few weeks ago:
_ _ _ _
What is true? What is false? We can not know precisely. There is an uncertainty in all values. The best we can do is reach a conclusion beyond a reasonable doubt – and it is here where the common man falls short.
What am I?
I work to bring balance towards my oppositions. I attempt to find certainty in uncertainty. I am the Apollo to my Dionysus, and the Dionysus of my Dionysus. I am the counterweight that is relatively proportional to the opposition’s effort. I am the collapse of infinity into the finite. I ride upon the highest value in a sea of indefinite values.
Let’s see just how omniscient we can become in a world created upon the unknown.
Is life a meaningless tragedy, or an optimistic eternity? Furthermore, did we have a choice in determining this outcome? Those are moral questions, and in order to understand them I believe we must look into the physical laws that govern our existence.
Say that perhaps our one goal as living beings is to become aware of what we really are, but due to the very nature of our actions we are incapable of doing so. Even if we were capable of this enlightenment, wouldn’t accomplishing it undo our own existence?
Unfortunately, I think the evidence points towards the fact that we may never find true transcendence during life, because we would need to solve an infinite amount of variables. How can we solve an infinite amount of variables if we have difficulties knowing if we have even solved one or any at all? But aren’t infinity and singularity synonymous? So if we ever were to solve one variable, create one point of certain value, wouldn’t we descend to a lower value? Then how are we here, considering our ability to observe is evidence of at least some value being made certain. It is here that I conclude that this “point of certain value” can only exist a priori. These points are the illusion presented to a systematic observer. Observation requires time, and time requires uncertainty. This would seem to call for a disassembling of the systematic observer in order to create a “point of real/certain value”. However, I believe it actually calls for a unification of all observers. The misconception of a disassembly being necessary for unification is due to a “low thought impulse”.
In the absence of thought/logic, a “low thought impulse” becomes action, as it is the most direct action that can be made when energy is absent or depleted. In other words, a “low thought impulse” outweighs in probability any action that requires energy, because a “low-thought impulse” does not require energy. Whenever singularity is achieved (or perhaps even before it can be achieved), expansion immediately follows.
This is much like the concept of a balloon. If we were to apply energy to a sphere, it is difficult to cause change while applying work inwards than if we were to cause that same amount of change while applying work outwards, this is because applying work outwards requires more space, and hence more energy is needed to continue causing change. If we pushed on a balloon inwards to try and condense it, it would pop. However we can change the structure of the balloon by blowing into it and letting it reach a certain volume of air before popping. Or we could let the balloon slowly diffuse its contents over time. This is why balloons do not continually inflate, and instead require energy in order to inflate. The more a balloon inflates, the more space it takes up, and the larger it gets. While a balloon is deflating, it takes up less space, and energy is given up from itself.
Think of the universe as a giant balloon, the latex that makes up the balloon is the edge of our universe. The more energy in our universe (the more we blow into the balloon), the larger its boundaries become. The boundaries of our universe are defined by the speed of light in all directions from a singularity since the moment when our universe was first created. Our universe before the big bang was an empty balloon. Energy was added to our universe, and the universe began to expand. Through astronomy, it would appear that our universe is still in the process of expanding. However, like a balloon, if it gets to a certain point it will pop. Assuming our universe hopefully doesn’t “pop”, which could very well be a possibility, then our universe must eventually begin to shrink back down to a singularity. Like a balloon, over time it will deflate.
Think about it though, the hotter a balloon becomes (or the more energy it has), the more it inflates and the larger it gets. However, the number of oxygen atoms would stay the same. Space is made between those oxygen atoms when heat-energy is applied to them. The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle suggests that when those oxygen atoms possess more energy, their probable location becomes larger.
From this it can be assumed that energy is “relative uncertainty”, and gravity is “relative certainty”. Time implies the existence of energy, which produces space, which reduces relative certainty, which diminishes the effect of relative gravity, which is certainty. Space is therefore an illusion created by energy, and in turn time and uncertainty are also illusions created by energy. In the complete absence of energy, we are all touching in one point of singularity. If this seems hard to grasp, it might be enlightening to view Einstein’s theory of relativity.
The speed of light serves as a universal speed limit, because if anything were to exceed that speed it would eventually go past the edge of the universe, where existence ceases. This paradox implies that the only reason it serves as a universal speed limit, is because you can not travel faster than the information you produce. When anything exceeds the speed of light, then it would transcend to a higher dimension of existence and in doing so it would disprove the universe it came from. Since the universe was a point of singularity at creation, all possible paths of time were already set in place. If any matter had at any point exceeded the speed of light, then it would exist outside of that original point of singularity, and therefore would not exist in the universe that the singularity creates. In effect, we can never escape our own universe, and our matter will be eternally bound within this universe until singularity is reached once again. Note: It can be seen in most models of physics that once matter reaches the speed of light, it becomes light (energy) itself.
The universe can be assumed to end in a “reverse expansion”, in which the universal boundaries will travel inwards (as the contents of the universe appear to be traveling outwards) and the boundaries devour the universe itself. When this happens, the boundaries of the universe will metaphorically “weigh” all the contents of the universe into the most probable location. It will then set the probable positioning of all matter as a point. This point becomes a point in another dimension, assumed to be information, which is then radiated in all directions from a particle in another dimension. When this bit of information comes in contact with another particle in a higher dimension, it is attracted towards the direction that the gravity came from. As a particles location changes, gravity is emitted. When gravity is emitted, a particle’s location will change. Energy and gravity are within a constant continuum known as the space time continuum. The continuum is so entangled, that even gravity itself can cause energy, and even energy itself can cause gravity.
Infinite gravity, or absolute certainty, creates a relative singularity. We know this as “black holes”. Black holes are only infinitely certain relative to the matter that makes itself up. Lets not get caught up in black holes though, that is another whole discussion.
We can assume that our thoughts form a singularity a priori, within a systematic observer’s inward projection of information that is relevant to its own position in time and space. This position in time and space can never be completely self-known to an observer, as this would collapse the observer into infinity.
Our thoughts form a quantum field (an illusionary singularity), which is what we perceive as ourselves. How can we perceive ourselves at all if there is a constant delay in the travel of information? We can never perceive our current self, only our past self. Our current self is unified as a fractioned point in a higher dimension. Our past self however, exists as its own reality. It is a “point within a point” so to speak. Perhaps the variance in location of all matter in a spatial dimension is because all observers rooted in a time dimension will observe the space differently.
Physical Religion?
We ourselves, as observers, exist as a virtual pathway of connections: our neuronal network. Since this virtual pathway must exist because we exist, it exists in singularity (in certainty). The point “that is”. Do religions illustrate this? Christianity has its way of describing the path to a unified point, which is to love (or make connection) and enter heaven upon death. Buddhism has its way of describing the path to a unified point, which is to release our desires that cause reoccurrence, so that we may be relinquished from reoccurrence and transcend. This raises the question “Is there some mysterious value a person must reach?” I can’t really provide an answer for that, and the answer seems to collapse in upon personal preference. Concerning religion however, what I am saying is merely personal self-questioning and it is open to interpretation. Could it be possible that the 5th dimension, which is above time, is morality? With that, this writing is concluded, as that question seems to be answered only with philosophical opinions.
Part 2
To begin, lets announce these basic ideas:
Information must be made up of energy.
All matter, energy, and the action of the forces that dictate the two, can only travel as fast as the speed of light.
Energy causes change, and in a sense energy is change.
If matter has energy, the matter is also moving. Since both are equivalent, all matter is moving.
Matter in relationship to itself is motionless.
Matter in its relationship to other matter, will be perceived as moving.
Every time an interaction of matter with matter occurs, energy is transferred.
An interaction between matter can only occur when matter detects the presence of other matter through means of a force carrier.
Matter could be defined as collected energy that is not currently causing change and is not under the effect of time. But essentially, what is matter? More specifically, what is a single point of matter? Matter is simply an “on” value, surrounded by an “off” value. A single point or bit of matter would seem to be a hollow sphere, with a surface that is infinitely thin. This hollow sphere (which I shall refer to from here on as “point matter”) exists as a single entity of itself. It is in all aspects uncertain, but possesses the ability to make miniscule observations. When this point matter is not being observed (which is impossible, but still imagine the concept), its location is completely indefinite. The more a point matter is being observed, the smaller it becomes relevant to the observer. The less a point matter is being observed, the larger it becomes relevant to the observer. This raises the question of “How does a point matter exist, if observation of itself is necessary in order for it to exist?” This can be explained by knowing that the point-matter makes inward observations towards itself (within the sphere) to determine relative location. “Observation” from the surface of the point matter is sent in towards itself at the speed of light, in order to determine its own relative location. We witness this effect as a “force”. Depending on certain variables, this force may be witnessed as one of many things such as electromagnetism or gravity.
The speed of light is reached when matter reaches the maximum allowed speed and becomes pure energy.
The Effect of Gravity:
Here is a very simplified model that summarizes the cause of gravity:
When two pieces of matter detect each other at the same time, they both send information towards each other. This information that is sent could be thought of as “bits”.
Both bits of information collide with each other, and produce two bits of “reverse information”. This “reverse information” is under the effect of reverse time, and will travel back to its original source. Since the original source has moved in the time that the “information” was traveling, colliding, and traveling back as “reverse” information, a triangle is formed of the three paths (the three paths being the information path, the travel path of the source, and the path of the reverse information). Since the “reverse information’s” travel time back to its source must be precisely equal to the amount of time it took to travel to the point of collision, the negative information will in effect exceed the speed of light while traveling back to its source. This in effect, bends the space-time continuum.
Once it reaches its source, the source matter will then regain the lost value that it had to use to originally produce the information. However, the matter will have to compensate for its violation of exceeding the speed of light, and will have to move back in time as if it had never released the energy in the first place. Since the space-time continuum has been bent, the matter (which was the original source of the information) will instantaneously move a short distance down the path that the “reverse information” traveled. This is the effect of gravity.
Why does this happen? Imagine it like this. Everything originated as a singularity. This singularity simply “was”. It existed because there was no alternative other than non-existence (non-existence was a point of its own which I will discuss later in other essays). This point of existence simply “had value” (more specifically it had an “on” value). This singularity somehow for some reason (or perhaps no reason or an inherent reason) had uncertainty in its value. Uncertainty can be expressed in additional dimensions. This caused for the point to be plotted on a line, or in other words the point had a line going out of it in two directions, or perhaps two lines going out of it in two directions. One direction was certainty, and the other direction was uncertainty. This line went on infinitely. When something has an infinite value, it transcends to a higher dimension. Basically meaning that the two ends of the line eventually met in infinity, and this formed another point. This also defined a circle. With these two points, space and time were unified as a line. Both points could be anywhere on the line, but could never exist in the same exact location. These two points had opposite integer charges.
Nothing was stopping these two points from each creating another point. Eventually (or instantaneously?) that happened, and two points turned into three (or another imagined shape for this could be a “Y” shape) which turned the circle into a cylinder, which in turn became a sphere, and that sphere turned into a hyper-sphere, and the process continued infinitely.
Since all points were touching in a different dimension, there is a relevancy between those points that is transferred. This is seen as gravity – a flaw in inter-dimensional transit.
There is an infinite amount of dimensions. An observer exists with the perception of the dimension below him (to us this is space), and the perception of the dimension above him (to us this is time). Both the above dimension, and the below dimension are perceived by the observer to be constant with each other. For us, this is the space-time continuum. Any dimensions that are further above or below are unknown to the observer, although dimensions further below space can be assumed to exist. The below dimension is perceived as a “set”, and the above dimension is perceived as “uncertain”. The above dimension is really only perceived because of a change in the set dimension.
An observer can only observe the dimensions below that which it is placed (certainty), but it itself is placed within the dimension above it (uncertainty). The observer is aware that it exists in time, but does not know where in time it exists. Without the observer becoming apparently aware of it, the observer is moving in the dimension that exists above it in not one, but two directions. In one direction lies existence, and in the other direction lies non-existence. This begs for the discussion to enter morality.
