I apologize if any of this comes across as insulting. I'm adding this disclaimer now after having typed my replies because I know I'm gonna come off snarky. I just don't really know how to communicate appropriately to people that have never raised children, because the vast majority of the time, they "just don't get it."
no problem. i always appreciate and respect your posts, r*n*r. but, i think we're going to have to agree to disagree as it pertains to spanking.
the bottom line is that i'm not going to spank my children. i've seen enough people get through to children in non-violent ways and despite whether or not you think i "get" it, it's entirely possible.
i have a sister that is 8 years younger than me and throughout my high-school summers, i baby-sat 2 or more children at least 40 hours a week, and during the school year several nights a week after school or on the weekends. despite all the time i spent with them, i’m not bold enough to tell another childless woman who had less experience that i know anymore than she or that she simply doesn’t “get” it.
agreed you have had great experience as a nanny or baby-sitter or with children as a family member, but you were you really in charge of raising those children… or did you just watch them? ime, i walked into a situation, i knew the rules, the children knew the rules, i was just there to make sure they followed the rules their parents already put into place.
if you were delegated as the person to actually rear the children, then it’d be no surprise if they misbehaved. in that situation, it's inconsistent parenting and their parents are essentially neglecting their responsibilities as a parent.
part of the purpose of my previous replies was to give examples of ways to discipline without hitting. that non-violent discipline can be just as effective if not more effective, than spanking.
Obviously you missed the parts where I said, several times, that SOME children never need spanking because they respond well to other forms of discipline.
i understand that you think some children do and some do not need spanking; i didn't miss that point. but, EVERY friend i know with children who've made a conscious decision not to spank, has great kids. you can't convince me that it's idealistic to think i'd never need to spank my child. and you won’t convince me that spanking is ever necessary or that inherently bad kids come out of the womb raising Cain (UNLESS there is an underlying behavioral disorder).
And I believe the Flying Spaghetti Monster conducts our lives through the power of His Great Noodly Appendage.
yep; just a tad snarky.
Granted, my parents were shitty parents, but I was always a good kid. My brother was, and still is, a piece of shit kid. The same parents produce wildly different children all the time, because EVERYONE IS DIFFERENT, even as a child. He's a druggie dropout loser living at home that just knocked up a 17 year old. I'm a college graduate with a job, a home, and a car of my own. And my parents used waaaaayyy less discipline on him, spanking, verbal, or otherwise; but they did use lots of discipline compared to average on both of us.
okay? so you're saying your parents weren't consistent in the way they raised you and your brother? and they disciplined you more than they did your brother? forgive me if my mind isn’t exactly blown, that you’d be totally different individuals, one of you leading a more respectful life than the other.
i think i've made it clear that parents definitely need to discipline their children. the only difference is that i fully believe it can be done more effectively and less barbarically without spanking.
And what do you do when your child repeatedly tries to drink bleach, touch the stove, or hit other children? What do you do if your kid keeps stealing after you make them return their spoils and volunteer and all that?
okay, the bleach thing - as a parent it’s your responsibility to keep harmful chemicals away and out of reach of children. the stove touching thing, i will agree, is a toughie, just as i mentioned when a child runs into a street... a child endangering themselves without necessarily realizing it is scary as a parent i can imagine, and i could see how a parent might react out of fear, but I think it’s important not to. i think the child should be removed from the situation, firmly told "no" and put into time-out. each time they cross that line, you do it again for longer periods or more severe punishment (without spanking).
if i've exhausted every non-violent disciplinary resource available and my child is still disobeying in ways that are harmful or disrespectful, then i think it's time to try counseling; maybe there's an underlying behavioral problem that needs addressed. i don't accept that some kids are just bad (unless they're chemically imbalanced) - there are bad parents who've taught their children, whether they mean to or not, bad or unsuccessful lessons.
what are you going to do when you’ve spanked your child and they’re still misbehaving? do it again, right? because you consistently do it until they’ve learned. i just feel you can get better and quicker results without humiliating, hurting or striking fear into your kids.
No one here is advocating punishing accidents. That's the entire point - spanking is only useful when used completely appropriately. And it would be nice if we all had places where it was safe for kids to play outside, and it would be nice if all children would go clean their rooms when you told them. But that's not how it works.
did you not read what this was in response to? BEEF/N/BROKLY and Lacey both said their kids would deserve a smack for breaking their hard-earned television, which is an accident. i understand that breaking the t.v. was a consequence of them doing something they weren’t supposed to: rough-playing in the house. and sure i can understand some people don’t have a backyard to shoo their child into, but that doesn’t give you an excuse to take the easiest method available and spank. i provided only two examples of alternate methods of either redirection to prevent the accident or punish the rule-breaking. you could also take half of their saved allowance (and then immediately deposit it into a savings account specifically for your kid)… i don’t know. i’m not there, yet… i’m not sure which toy or thing or whatever my child is going to miss most if it were taken away.
And what do you do when that form of discipline doesn't work?
you do it again.
The more interesting fyi is that some children don't bond well at all through no fault of their parents. That's what really needs to be addressed. My brother was one of those children.
no offense, but your family life sounds a little fucked. are you sure they were consistent with attachment exercises? and even if they were, are you sure your brother doesn’t have some sort of mental illness? happy people don’t end up unproductive drug addicts.
So NOW I get you. You think hitting is wrong because your parents hit you wrong.
i did state this earlier in the thread. i think it’s wrong because it’s ineffective and sends the wrong message. admittedly, i’m more passionate and absolute about it due to my upbringing.
My parents were abusive as all hell and they were very confusing to me, but I KNEW what a spanking was for. The one good parenting tactic my parents had *was* spanking.
so, your parents either yelled abusive things at you or spanked you? you don’t think you could have learned the same lessons if they were consistently calm and collected and communicated through discussing their praises and displeasures? again, no offense, but your parents don’t exactly seem like the best examples of effective, quality parenting.
you know, while i understand and respect you won’t rule out spanking as a parent, if you’re an encouraging, consistent and stable parent (and the sort of parent i think you’ll be based from what i know of you), i think you’re gonna be surprised to find that you don’t birth one of these intrinsically “bad” children.
guess we should all check back in about 10 years.
