TheLoveBandit
Retired Never Was, Coulda been wannabe
Bob Loblaw said:I don't know if this has been said before or not, but being able to edit your vote(s) in polls would be very nice.
Might be helpful, but unpossible with both this version, and the next, of our site software. I'm afraid once you vote, that's it

To Maz's point of sigs....we've discussed it amongst staff and it is still under review of exactly how (and if) we might implement sigs at the upgrade. The idea of staff having them for site promotion has definite merit, but this also creates an area requiring policing. Staff....has a sig for site benefit, great; has a sig for personal stuff, we probably ought to charge them as a perk like we do members (if that is the plan we follow). But then members...has a personal sig, paid perk is fine; tries to have a sig for site benefit....do you charge? Probably have to but then there also comes a point of what qualifies as 'personal' vs 'site benefit' ... I think these are fairly minor issues, and things we can sort out as we move forward. I mainly wanted to say that I, personally, believe in the merit of Maz's suggestion but we need to ensure we employ sigs in general to the best benefit of the site.