mikemikemike said:
Thanks, though the latter part of my post was a joke, I truly didn't know that there was a chat here.
SUPPORT is serewius bidnizz
nabollocks, I'll admit what I'm reading for your proposal both meshes, and expands, some of what we've wanted to do and have already attempted to implement.
Case in point, we've got a dusty old set of FAQs, but the ones relevant to various forums aren't always linked, nor are they read all that much

Outdated? Misplaced? Not sure ... but it appears there is room to improve this so we've been testing the concept of a staff (member?) maintained wiki for such info, but we're still trying to test software that can integrate well enough with our existing site software.
Likewise, last year we launched our DRUG STUDIES forum in an effort to connect researchers with our membership, as it provieds a win-win for both sides and furthers the efforts of HR and drug education. Part of the arrangement is to do everything in our power to have the results of those studies published in ways that are easily accessible to our membership. This sounds like it somewhat relates to your ideas, not perfectly or completely, but somewhat. And we've been struggling to refine this forum and it's information. We're alway open to ideas on that as well. I'll point out that some of the regional forum likes EADD and AusDD have historically hosted such threads locally, and several of our forums have MEGA threads that are also excellent resources of information...just packed away in corners of the site and not known or easily found across the site as well as we'd like.
Then again, we've got some excellent information in DITM - which has a lot of legal articles linked for discussion but also some research information.
I guess what I'm driving at is that we have a mish-mash of ideas that have been tried over time, and what worked well at one time may not currently be the best solution. New ideas like yours, heck yeah they are worth discussing and considering as we move forward. There'd be some grumbling if we try to change how things currently are for some active areas, but so long as we find ideas and can implement them in ways that best serve our members and the world at large, then I think we'd be able to move ahead. It just needs proper discussion and planning (and ideas!). Let me run a few things past the staff, but perhaps we can spin this point into a different discussion

Give us a moment.