MazDan said:
........its NOT art............its vandalism.
so if some fascist government would take over the world and declare that art is now illegal, does that mean that for you, in your view of the world, that all you have, your books, painting, music....would not be art anymore ?
__________
sorry but here come the rant...
i mean how the fuck can it be related in your views?
lots of book have been burn....
lots of artist have died for their art...
how about chocolate jesus, porno bush,.. there use to be a time when the church was the law...
the best "art" i have ever seen was on lsd, it was all in my head.. but lsd is illegal
does that mean that when you trip you don't value your experience or.... well i don't know, doesn't seems to make any sense to me just like graf doesn't seems to make any sense to you...
one in my town
(vieux québec)
i suppose its a legal "Burner"
(i didn't took the picture, there is some better one too)
Anyway for my part i don't see how art can be anything else then subjective, but so is everything including subjectivity..
Hence the worst weed in the world is not a weed if its wanted in that spot.
so its not weed when its in my pipe ??
ceci n'est pas une pipe ???
but really its wanted there by some and not by other, are you saying money and power are the one who decide if its art or not ?
i think artist should decide what is art, the public should decide what is art, and we should all have different views on it, cause if we would end up defining what exactly is art, well, then i think it wouldn't be art anymore
...