• 🇬🇧󠁿 🇸🇪 🇿🇦 🇮🇪 🇬🇭 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
    European & African
    Drug Discussion

    Welcome Guest!
    Posting Rules Bluelight Rules
  • EADD Moderators: Pissed_and_messed | Shinji Ikari

Gibberings CVII - Bubbles are Comforting

Status
Not open for further replies.
StoneHappyMonday

The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says:

16“This is the covenant I will make with them
after that time, says the Lord.
I will put my laws in their hearts,
and I will write them on their minds.” (hebrews)

The new covenant ( promise) was cut with the cross of Christ. It meant that we could receive Gods spirit ( the highest we can possibly be) and be guided by it rather than laws. There was no mistake. Adam and Eve chose to live a life independent of God. When we chose to act from our highest ( love) we are, in a sense, reconciled to God . (IMO)
 
Last edited:
parttime crackhead said:
Exactly true. Sadly enough there is a massive demand for this sort of thing. The magazine that published it would have been well aware it would cause a shit storm & they will already have cash set aside for any potential pay off resulting from a court case. It's a calculated risk by them, knowing that the extra publicity/magazine sales will be worth any potential fines etc.
Click to expand...


... although now there's a criminal case someone might be going to jail for it... which is fair enough. If I was caught standing on a ladder with my box brownie trying to snap my neighbour on the toilet (again) I'd probably go to court and have to sign the Sex Offender's Register.

I don't see it as being that different from voicemail hacking really. Bet the Duchess of Kent and Fergie are currently negotiating sponsorship rights on their breasts and will shortly be photographed bearing more badges than yer average F1 car.
 
YellowPolkaDotHalo said:
The Holy Spirit also testifies to us about this. First he says:

16“This is the covenant I will make with them
after that time, says the Lord.
I will put my laws in their hearts,
and I will write them on their minds.” (hebrews)

The new covenant ( promise) was cut with the cross of Christ. It meant that we could receive Gods spirit ( the highest we can possibly be) and be guided by it rather than laws. There was no mistake. Adam and Eve chose to live a life independent of God. When we chose to act from our highest ( love) we are, in a sense, reconciled to God . (IMO)
Click to expand...

I see no mention of paparazzi in there. Nor sociopaths. Nor much of any relevance to non-Christians.

jancrow said:
I don't see it as being that different from voicemail hacking really. Bet the Duchess of Kent and Fergie are currently negotiating sponsorship rights on their breasts and will shortly be photographed bearing more badges than yer average F1 car.
Click to expand...

:D
 
Marmalade said:
Cool, so let's discuss the above in relation to the point made by SHM re Western values/decadence and Al Queda etc. Far more interesting, the other stuffs a done deal already (for me anyways ... long lens perv photography and celebporn is nasty and not worth defending ).
Click to expand...

Ehm, you do realise that you're not actually in charge? Let's discuss whatever people want to discuss. If you want to discuss that then batter in - discuss. Make a point of some sort. Rather than just asking other people to not discuss one thing & discuss another because you'll find it more interesting.

badandwicked said:
^ I agree with all that.

But I think its William that's pissy, cos of what happened with his mum. maybe it was a knee jerk, nip it in the bud type reaction. She was very brave to agree to marry him, it can't have been an easy decision and he probably just want to protect her & his marriage as much as he can.
Click to expand...

Agreed, up to the point of "She was very brave to agree to marry him". Come on. Marry into absolute never-ending luxury & untold wealth? Marry into royalty ffs. Aye, must have been a really difficult decision lol.

jancrow said:
... although now there's a criminal case someone might be going to jail for it... which is fair enough. If I was caught standing on a ladder with my box brownie trying to snap my neighbour on the toilet (again) I'd probably go to court and have to sign the Sex Offender's Register.

I don't see it as being that different from voicemail hacking really. Bet the Duchess of Kent and Fergie are currently negotiating sponsorship rights on their breasts and will shortly be photographed bearing more badges than yer average F1 car.
Click to expand...

She was outside though. Still not exactly defending it but it's not the same as trying to photograph someone through the window while they're taking a shit. If your neighbour was taking a shit outside in the garden, I think it's fine for you to photograph it lol.

Fergie would sell her tits for a tenner. Not a picture. Her actual tits.
 
Firstly I apologise for bringing up the bible.

parttime crackhead said:
Has anyone ever seen any dodgy photos of the queen? Have they fuck. Ironically enough, the queen seems to have some common sense.
.
Click to expand...

Or is it because the Queen comes from a generation that was prudish about the human body so she never gets her tits out?

Now we're not prudes of course. And women are more free .....to show their tits off for the benefit of men.
 
parttime crackhead said:
Agreed, up to the point of "She was very brave to agree to marry him". Come on. Marry into absolute never-ending luxury & untold wealth? Marry into royalty ffs.
Click to expand...

Just look at the ugly, balding, inbred, demikraut she's been lumbered with though - you'd have to be brave to fuck that.
 
StoneHappyMonday said:
Firstly I apologise for bringing up the bible.



Or is it because the Queen comes from a generation that was prudish about the human body so she never gets her tits out?

Now we're not prudes of course. And women are more free .....to show their tits off for the benefit of men.
Click to expand...

Haha. Fair point. On the "we're not prudes" part, totally agree. Which is why I think this has become a far bigger issue than it needed to be, due to the response. If they'd just went "She was on holiday, getting a tan, so fuck?" it would have blown over in day. If the UK papers had just mocked the French magazine for even giving a fuck, as oppose to making out like they'd just shat on the queen's face. Now they're at court, giving even more publicity to that magazine while the editor is doing a wee dance giving it "YAAAAAS!".

badandwicked said:
Imo its a bit like the idea of winning £160 million quid. Life changing but not necessarily in a good way.
Click to expand...

Disagree totally on that. Life changing but not in a good way? If not then it's 100% that individuals fault. At least with a lottery win you don't have to pump mad mini-Charles & make sure you don't annoy the queen lol.
 
parttime crackhead said:
She was outside though. Still not exactly defending it but it's not the same as trying to photograph someone through the window while they're taking a shit. If your neighbour was taking a shit outside in the garden, I think it's fine for you to photograph it lol.
Click to expand...

But what if my neighbour was just sunbathing naked and would have been hidden from view had I not fucked about up a ladder? It's private property and if she was impossible to see without me climbing a ladder she would have a reasonable expectation of privacy. Actually my neighbour's gorgeous. If she takes a shit in the garden I will try to get a picture and put it up here.

Fergie would sell her tits for a tenner. Not a picture. Her actual tits.
Click to expand...

A tenner for BOTH and that's as high as I'll go.
 
parttime crackhead said:
Disagree totally on that. Life changing but not in a good way? If not then it's 100% that individuals fault. At least with a lottery win you don't have to pump mad mini-Charles & make sure you don't annoy the queen lol.
Click to expand...

OK you know best, having been both a lottery winner & a member of a royal family. King Crackhead IV. Your self assurance is admirable ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top