@Deru This is what everyone should be shooting up
Bro i hope you washed your hands before shooting up
@Deru This is what everyone should be shooting up
i burned my fingers smoking crack haha my hands were clean. i needed to clip my nails aswell meh, being a junkie makes you so lazy.Bro i hope you washed your hands before shooting up
i burned my fingers smoking crack haha my hands were clean. i needed to clip my nails aswell meh, being a junkie makes you so lazy.
bro i've shot up like 5000 times at least, never had an infection even when i missed shots. Shooting up pure opioids is a total different game. Also cocaine did more damage to my veins in 3 months than 5 years of shooting morphine ever did.I was just busting your balls
Still though becareful. When i was a junkie i was paranoid about infection and stunk like rubbing alcohol all the time. To this day i associate the smell of isopropyl alcohol with shooting up.
I'm telling you fentanyl wds are fucking horrible.much worse than others.stupid idea.
So do you mean fentanyl is more dangerous because there is a smaller window of error for an overdose?
If you take 25 mcg/day (0.025 mg) of fentanyl via parenteral administration that is roughly 2.5 mg of morphine (MME).
At the correct dose, I still fail to see how it's more dangerous than diacetylmorphine.
I will reiterate this again, it stems from a lack of knowledge of how to dose properly, and with illicit fentanyl, the inability to know exactly what the purity of any given sample is and if it's a specific fentanyl analogue.
But if we're discussing pharmaceutical grade fentanyl to pharmaceutical grade diacetylmorphine, then it becomes an error in dosing first and foremost.
As for recreational benefits, fentanyl is poor at euphoria and the high. It only succeeds in it's ability to relieve withdrawal symptoms for cheap - if dosed correctly.
Just because someone does a subjective "tiny" bump and felt like they were going to overdose means very little - the correct dose of fentanyl is almost microscopic. A lot of this is based on drawing incorrect conclusions trying to compare a similar line of fentanyl to a line of heroin, while trying to compensate on the fly by making the line much smaller than one would for heroin, a "tiny" bump would still be technically too high of a dose depending upon purity - and then assuming correlation equals causation with their experience thereafter. It's called anecdotal for a reason. They're failing to acknowledge the exact same thing would happen if they dosed diacetylmorphine too much as well.
But yes, the window and margin of error is much smaller with fentanyl than with diacetylmorphine. This is where the danger lies.
You start your post trying to say I’m wrong and end it by agreeing with me.
-GC
The therapeutic window of fentanyl is actually significantly larger than that of diacetylmorphine.
The therapeutic window is simply the range between the minimum effective concentration to produce analgesia and the dose where respiratory depression sets in.
The problem is its potency and in some regards its pharmacokinetics. Overall you might say it would be safer than heroin if it were equipotent to diacetylmorphine on a mg to mg basis. If fentanyl possessed the respiratory depressant properties of diacetylmorphine overdoses would occur at an even higher rate.
A user who is able to inject the equivalent of 10mg of pure fentanyl might not be as lucky with an equianalgesic dose of heroin (which would be around half a gram of pure diacetylmorphine).
I couldn’t agree more. I recently experienced my tolerance drop the other day. It was scary to say the least.Famous last words. Be careful with this attitude because tolerance is a funny thing. There are days where it just seems lower for whatever reason and the usual dose even from a known source like a pharmaceutical can put you in the grave. It happened to me though I managed to avoid death, it has happened to my friends, and most of those people have relocated to a place 6 feet under. Most of them didn't even use the needle and managed to do this through the nasal or oral ROAs.
Not trying to be a dick just don't want to see them take away another soul. I'm not a person that got clean and hates opioids now. I still love them more than any other class of drug on Earth. I'll still play with them from time to time in the privacy of my own home. All that has changed is I have a healthy respect for them now.
Specifically, due to your lack of knowledge, you improperly used the fentanyl and over dosed with the fentanyl - literally took too much to lead you to feel like that. An overdose, itself, is a spectrum and doesn't mean unconscious or death.
For someone like you, you're right. Fentanyl is definitely more dangerous than heroin if you're unwilling to be open to learn - so keep on keeping on.
Heroin gives a much larger window for error when it comes to proper dosing.
The therapeutic window of fentanyl is actually significantly larger than that of diacetylmorphine.
The therapeutic window is simply the range between the minimum effective concentration to produce analgesia and the dose where respiratory depression sets in.
The problem is its potency and in some regards its pharmacokinetics. Overall you might say it would be safer than heroin if it were equipotent to diacetylmorphine on a mg to mg basis. If fentanyl possessed the respiratory depressant properties of diacetylmorphine overdoses would occur at an even higher rate.
A user who is able to inject the equivalent of 10mg of pure fentanyl might not be as lucky with an equianalgesic dose of heroin (which would be around half a gram of pure diacetylmorphine).
I agree fentanyl is more dangerous in respect to the way its sold on the street in unidentifiable amounts. Fatal overdoses have skyrocketed ever since illicit fentanyl was introduced into heroin, pills, etc.
Mine was only a technical note in controlled conditions.
The pharmacokinetics of fentanyl also make it dangerous in uncontrolled settings.
It does have a great euphoria but it's just not a full spectrum hit.like it's missing a tiny bit.and it's just so compulsive.you start craving more even if you're still fukd up.it doesn't have to wear off before craving kicks inI appreciate what your getting at but therapeutic window doesn’t correlate with euphoria. In the end we can all agree almost everybody, bar a few individuals, likes to use opiates that make one feel good.
So fentanyl’s therapeutic window is larger, this simply means the effects used in medicine like analgesia and sedation happen at dosages farther away from OD than Diacetylmorphine.
BUT... And I’ll say this til I die. Fentanyl’s lack of euphoria will cause many users to push it until they are close to overdose simply because it’s not giving them what they want.
The effects we use these drugs for don’t often fall into “therapeutic effects” and things like euphoria are unwanted side effects.
I stand by my statement that fentanyl is inherently more dangerous.
-GC
It does have a great euphoria but it's just not a full spectrum hit.like it's missing a tiny bit.and it's just so compulsive.you start craving more even if you're still fukd up.it doesn't have to wear off before craving kicks in