Sepher
Bluelight Crew
Not got the evidence as yet probably because you're still going through the formalities re: appropriate court and venue, but soon as you get handed off to Crown your solicitor / barrister will request full disclosure of CPS' evidence. They have to give you all the evidence they're gonna present that they think supports their case, but perhaps more importantly all the evidence that undermines it, or puts a different spin on things. First thing you do is look at what they've chosen to present out of the whole. They'll be very selective in their choice of that evidence which supports their case, so look first at what they've chosen not to bring up, and if they're choosing not to use something that seems relevant see if that's because it casts things in a different light, or could be interpreted in a way that backs you up as far as not knowing the phone calls and money transfers were concerned with the supply of illegal substances.
The cultivation charge is imprisonable in its own right these days, you know that, don't you? Even for two plants, personal use, no suggestion of supply to anyone else. Used to be typically dealt with in Magistrates Court and punished with fines and / or community sentences when it was Cat C, but a 2011 ruling by the Court of Appeal on the case of R v Auton and others effectively amounts to sentencing guidelines that mandate a prison sentence of between 9 and 18 months for even the very lowest level of cultivation for personal use. Be very careful how you go with this one. If CPS feel like they can't get you for supply or being concerned in the supply they might well settle for the winnable cultivation charge and push for a sentence at the upper end of the range. Wonder if you could get this dealt with seperately, preferably at Magistrates so they don't have to pass it up to Crown as part of a package of offences. Don't know that sentencing guidelines are any different, but at least they'd be dealing with a single offence for which you can offer mitigation, acceptable mitigation being evidence drug used to help with a medical condition, evidence offender’s vulnerability was exploited, evidence of pressure, intimidation or coercion falling short of duress
The cultivation charge is imprisonable in its own right these days, you know that, don't you? Even for two plants, personal use, no suggestion of supply to anyone else. Used to be typically dealt with in Magistrates Court and punished with fines and / or community sentences when it was Cat C, but a 2011 ruling by the Court of Appeal on the case of R v Auton and others effectively amounts to sentencing guidelines that mandate a prison sentence of between 9 and 18 months for even the very lowest level of cultivation for personal use. Be very careful how you go with this one. If CPS feel like they can't get you for supply or being concerned in the supply they might well settle for the winnable cultivation charge and push for a sentence at the upper end of the range. Wonder if you could get this dealt with seperately, preferably at Magistrates so they don't have to pass it up to Crown as part of a package of offences. Don't know that sentencing guidelines are any different, but at least they'd be dealing with a single offence for which you can offer mitigation, acceptable mitigation being evidence drug used to help with a medical condition, evidence offender’s vulnerability was exploited, evidence of pressure, intimidation or coercion falling short of duress


)))))))