i don't CARE!!!IcebergSlim said:why you mad felix ? daft punk is thrilled about kanye's song.

i can highly recommend a cocktail of mdma, acid and 2cb %)L2R said:hell, i might even take drugs


AmorRoark said:No, that's ok. The NEMD gang should come over here more often anyway! :D
felix said:i can highly recommend a cocktail of mdma, acid and 2cb %)![]()
daft punk live is FULL of moments like that. oh boy are you gonna have a great time lefty, i'm jealous as hell %)
felix said:daft punk live is FULL of moments like that. oh boy are you gonna have a great time lefty, i'm jealous as hell %)
there may be similarities in the tracklisting, but I think the Alive one was recorded at the Paris Bercy show this year. (Which is very similar to the set they played at Rockness in Scotland, as witnessed by me and bro Cletus thereRated E said:I've been listening to the Live @ Coachella set from the net for a while. It looks similar to the Alive track list (I have a feeling it's the same set).
wow, you seem rather difficult to please.Banquo said:I'm a huge Daft Punk fan. However, Alive 2007 is really disappointing. Maybe they are trying to guard from people ripping off their live tracks, but the crowd noise, echo effect, and re-production on this album is horrible to the point where the audience recording from Coachella is better. Sure, there are tracks where the clarity and transparency in sound make the CD better than a bootleg. In this sense, the album is worth it. But all things considered, Daft Punk screwed up a chance to knock this one out of the park. Couldn't they have just injected crowd noise intermittently like other live recordings?