2900 bags is NOT <snip> worth of dope. ESPECIALLY if you buying at that bulk of a level! LOL!! Thats like $<snip> at the most. retail, yea it would be a little more than that but RESALE, retail street value is still NOWHERE NEAR <snip>s. Try cuttin that in half and maybe you will be a little closer.
but as far as how much it was ACTUALLY worth meaning the price HE paid for it, I would be willing to put money on it being a 4-digit number.
Shake, the price is quoted in the ARTICLE. You edited my post but you left the article, LOL. :D

If its all good that the article can say that this number of bags is worth this much money, then I aint sure how my post where I just used the exact same figures as the article and said "no, that aint correct" is any different.
Aint challenging u or nothin, but jus wanted to point that out, becuz i figured u might not of noticed that the original price discussion actually was IN the ARTICLE and was still there and that for the sake of bein consistent u might want to either say, OK, well if we gonna allow the article to say this then its fair for a post to make vague, very general observations about those amounts in the article, or say, if we gonna say that BL'er1 cannot say that XXX drugs are/aint worth XXX money, but the article quoted in the post can say that XXX drugs costs XXX money, then we just need to make BOTH of them edited. It dont help much to avoid prices if you leave the prices in the article

I didnt feel like my post was out of line becuz i didnt name specific numbers of my own, all I did was repeat the shit from the article and say it was off point, and then post some real vague, broad type of generalizations about the prices and how they related to the prices that already been named in the article and was allowed to stay.
Anyways, it aint no thing, just figured it is prolly best to allow both or neither but not one or the other and that u prolly just overlooked that part of the article.
