GenericMind said:
RCs seem to be even mor problematic in that regard.
I'm sorry, but this statement is completely meaningless. "RC" is an extremely unscientific term and should
not be used when making this type of comparison. Now, if you're talking about a specific subset of RC's that are chemically very similar, that's OK, like this statement:
GenericMind said:
I have heard scattered reports of long-term negative side-effects from some of the 2C family.
I have extensive experience with a wide range of psychedelics including 2C's, and I don't believe that they have any more negative long-term effects than most other serotonergic psychedelics. 2C-B has been on the illicit drug market for significantly longer than other 2C-class substances, and I haven't seen a greater incidence of reports of negative long-term effects than say, acid, or mushrooms.
Recept said:
Other drugs can cause these lingering effects as well, but 2C-I is probably the most prone to that. Even a single experience may cause visual disturbances that last for months in some individuals.
You could make this statement about
any psychedelic in a susceptible individual.
Also, before making statements about the long-term aftereffects of a specific drug,
make sure that use of other drugs might not be a confouding factor, or add a disclaimer if it is a possibility.
People, please think twice before going around and saying "OMG, RC=HPPD!" I think that most statements like this are backed by an implicit assumption that traditional psychedelics such as acid and mushrooms are less likely to cause these effects–an assumption that I don't think you can make. If you go into a trip on a traditional psychedelic with the expectation that you're not going to have negative aftereffects, you're probably going to be more likely to ignore or brush off any that may appear. The converse applies for more exotic, newer drugs.