Can you explain why you think that? You've already shown several times that you havn't the wit to grasp my point. What's going on in your mind? Is it still telling you that I am saying "kill all policemen"?
... to see someone unload a 12 bore in their face is probably the best retribution we are ever likely to see.
Yeah that was a bit harsh, we don't know his history or what led up to it. Don't know why I said it really...![]()
Tomlinson had been in scuffle with the police earlier and he was piss drunk hardly the innocent person walking home from work....there was a little bit more to the story.Ian Tomlinson wasn't innocent? He wasn't even a protestor, he was walking home when he walked in front of a gang of cops who assaulted him for no reason whatsoever.
As you're obviously a bit simple (by linking Tomlinson to Moat you show a particular lacking of intelligence) I probably shouldn't be too hard on you.
Tomlinson had been in scuffle with the police earlier and he was piss drunk hardly the innocent person walking home from work....there was a little bit more to the story.
You can have a three-post discussion with Issy before it becomes obvious that you've 'won'.
You make out like he'd been shot in the head by the coppers...
No, I've made out he was killed by a policeman. Are you claiming he wasn't? I don't think it matters too much to his family how he was killed do you? He's fucking dead all the same.
go to a few more protests you might learn a few things
Not if a silly little wanker like you is there. (see, we can call each other wanker but does it get us anywhere? Why not make you point without insults?)
And as I've told you many times, Tomlinson wasn't a protestor.
What does your Daily Mail say about it all?![]()
Or is that just what it says in the sun?
No but he was Dolescum so who cares?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10584777.stmMoat spent a week on the run after allegedly shooting his former girlfriend, killing her new boyfriend and later shooting a police officer. During the week, he wrote long letters and left recordings detailing his grievances and explaining his actions.
Prof Wilson said it was the "need of a paranoid narcissist to retain power and control over a set of circumstances that he didn't particularly like.
"Indeed one of the lenses [through which] we can interpret all of what's happened is about domestic violence.
"This is a man who clearly beat his partner, beat his child, and when his partner decides to leave him and move in with another man, he can't stand that situation and wants to retrieve it by shooting those people involved."
Prof Wilson said it was "typical of the domestic violence abuser" to consider that the use of violence, apologising for it and then justifying his actions meant he should be forgiven.